Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook A1110

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook A1110

Fujitsu LifeBook A1110 Review
Source: Notebookreview.com Archive.org version
The Fujitsu A1110 would be a great deal if it was $400 less than the current price of $999 for the configuration we reviewed. It offers a basic desktop replacement form-factor with a midrange processor and integrated graphics, which is the starting configuration for many budget notebook models. The design could be improved in many areas, but it does have a colorful lid which gives it a bit of a facelift. Build quality could be improved across the board with flexible plastic over the screen and palmrest. From what we have seen Fujitsu really needs to improve the design of this consumer notebook and rethink their pricing structure, especially now with the slumping economy.
Emissionen gut, Leistung gut, Verarbeitung schlecht, Preis schlecht, Mobilität schlecht
User Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2008
Rating: price: 40% performance: 80% mobility: 40% workmanship: 40% emissions: 80%

Fujitsu LifeBook A1110
Source: Computer Shopper Archive.org version
The LifeBook A1110 delivers solid performance at a reasonable price, and you can accessorize it with an assortment of colorful snap-on lid covers.
7.3 von 10, Leistung gut, Preis gut, Mobilität schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2008
Rating: price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 40%

50% Fujitsu LifeBook A1110
Source: PC Mag Archive.org version
Competing in the budget laptop market is hard, what with the cut-throat competition from giants like Dell and HP and the countless low-priced models being offered. The A1110 would fare better against the competition had Fujitsu spent more time designing a sleeker-looking chassis.
2.5 von 5, Lesitung gut, Preis sehr gut, Display gut, Mobilität schlecht, Verarbeitung mangelhaft
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 40% workmanship: 50%

Comment

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD: Onboard (shared Memory) GPU built in the GM45, GE45 and GS45 chipset (Montevina). Because of two more shaders and a higher core clock, much faster than the old GMA X3100. Still not advisable for gamers (DirectX 10 games not playable or only with very low settings). The integrated video processor is able to help decode HD videos (AVC/VC-2/MPEG2) , e.g., for a fluent Blu-Ray playback with slow CPUs.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

T5800: Entry level dual core processor based on the Merom core without Virtualization support and a low maximum temperature.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU