Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9110 vs Samsung Exynos W920 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100

Samsung Exynos 9110

► remove from comparison

The Samsung Exynos 9110 is a dual-core ARM based SoC for IoT (Internet of Things) devices like smartwatches. It was announced in 2018 and integrates two ARM Cortex A53 cores clocked at 1.15 GHz. It is manufactured in the 10LPP process at Samsung. The integrated ARM Mali-T720 GPU uses only one cluster (MP1) according to WikiChip.

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

The Samsung Exynos W920 is a dual-core ARM based SoC for IoT (Internet of Things) devices like smartwatches. It was announced in 2021 and integrates two ARM Cortex A55 cores clocked at 1.18 GHz. It is manufactured in the modern 5nm process. In addition to the CPU cores, the chip also integrates a ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, Cat.4 (DL) / Cat.5 (UL) LTE modem, 1080p HEVC/H.264/VP8 video engine and a LPDDR4 memory controller.

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Wear 4100

The Snapdragon Wear 4100 is a platform for smartwatches. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 at up to 1.7 GHz, An Adreno 504 GPU and a 750 MHz DDR3L memory controller. Furthermore, the QCC1110 AON co-processor (ARM Cortex-M0) can be used for always-on functionality. Without the QCC1110, the platform is only called Snapdragon Wear 4100.

According to Qualcomm, the Wear 4100 offers a 85% higher CPU and memory performance and the integrated GPU is 2.5x faster than the older Wear 3100.

the Snapdragon Wear 4100 is manufactured in 12nm, compared to the 28nm produced Wear 3100.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9110Samsung Exynos W920Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100
CodenameARM Cortex-A53ARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A53
Clock1150 MHz1180 MHz <=1700 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 24 / 4
Technology10 nm5 nm12 nm
iGPUARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-G68 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 504 (320 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
FeaturesMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps videoLPDDR3-750 Memory Controller, eMMC
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
19381 ms (23%)
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
min: 8710     avg: 9612     median: 9667 (11%)     max: 10459 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 2661     avg: 2782     median: 2782 (31%)     max: 2903 ms
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
min: 925     avg: 1106     median: 1019 (11%)     max: 1461 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1981     avg: 2076     median: 2076 (1%)     max: 2171 Points
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (1%)     max: 2166 Points
min: 3290     avg: 3451     median: 3444 (2%)     max: 3624 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9110 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 99% n=3

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 → 213% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 02. 21:34:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11540 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13150 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767386091s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11540 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 11540 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#11 got single benchmarks 13823 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13150 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#13 got single benchmarks 13150 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.022s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.022s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)