Doogee F7 Pro
Average of 4 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Doogee F7 Pro
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 63% performance: 60% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% display: 65% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pplware PT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN
Positive: Quality display; dual SIM; fast fingerprint sensor; good back camera. Negative: Mediocre sound; poor front camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Positive: Compact size; great built quality; large screen; decent cameras; good hardware; flexible fingerprint sensor; USB-C; long battery life. Negative: No extended memory.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/29/2016
CommentARM Mali-T880 MP4: Mobile graphics solution for tablets and smartphones, which can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Doogee Mobile Limited Company produces smarpthones under the Doogee brand. Their products have first been reviewed from 2015 and only sporadically. The ratings are below-average (as of 2016).
70.75%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.