Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB

Qualcomm 801 MSM8974AB

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB is an ARM-based SoC for tablets and smartphonesIt is built at TSMC in a 28nm HPM (High Performance Mobile) HKMG process, whereas the Snapdragon 600 was manufactured in 28nm LP. In addition to 4 CPU cores with a clock speed of up to 2.36 GHz, the chip also integrates an Adreno 330 GPU up to 578 MHz, an LPDDR3-1866 memory controller and various radio modules (UMTS/LTE, WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS). The slightly higher CPU/GPU clocks and faster memory support are the key differences to the Snapdragon 800 MSM8974.

Processor 

The CPU portion is based on Qualcomm's Krait architecture, which is compatible with the ARMv7 ISA. Compared to the Snapdragon 600 (Krait 300), the new Krait 400 cores of the Snapdragon 800/801 have been tweaked just slightly with faster L2 cache. Thanks to a clock rate of up to 2.36 GHz and a high performance per MHz somewhere between an ARM Cortex-A9 and a Cortex-A15, the Snapdragon 801 offers very strong CPU performance. The S801 competes with the Nvidia Tegra 4, Samsung Exynos 5420 and Apple A7 and is therefore one of the fastest ARM SoCs on the market as of 2013.

Graphics

Another difference between the Snapdragon 600 and 800/801 is the graphics unit. While the S600 implements an Adreno 320 (400 to 450 MHz), the S800 /S801 feature the faster Adreno 330 (MSM8974AB: 578 MHz). Both GPUs offer the same amount of texture units (8 TMUs), but the Adreno 330 has 50 percent more shaders (probably 6x SIMD16 vs. 4x SIMD16 of the previous generation)In conjunction with the higher memory bandwidth, the performance is significantly better. As a result, the Adreno 330 is slightly faster than the Mali-T628 (Exynos 5420) and the PowerVR G6430 (Apple A7). Depending on the device and cooling, however, the performance may vary. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as OpenCL 1.2.

Features 

Furthermore, the MSM8974AB supports many wireless technologies: Bluetooth 4.0, WLAN, IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), GSM (GPRS, EDGE), W-CDMA/UMTS (HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+, cat.29 DC-HSPA+), MBMS, cat.4 LTE, CDMA2000 (1X RTT, 1 × EV-DO Rel.0/Rev.A/Rev.B, 1× EV-DO Rev.A MC, 1× Adv Rev.A/Rev.B) and TD-SCDMA. 

The MSM8974AB can encode and play UHD 4K videos in 3840x2160 at 30 FPS (120 Mbps H.264 High Profile) simultaneously via dedicated hardware. Moreover, it supports both USB 2.0 and 3.0 and cameras up to 55 megapixels and stereoscopic 3D.

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 28nm HPM HKMG process, the energy efficiency has been improved significantly compared to its LP 28nm S600 predecessor. Depending on the field of application, the maximum power consumption should be about 3 W for smartphones or 4 W or greater for tablets. This should be similar to comparable ARM SoCs currently in the market. However, the MSM8974AB will likely to need a little more power than the slightly lower clocked MSM8974.

ModelARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHzQualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Krait 400
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC compare2.45 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB compare2.36 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB « 2.36 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA compare2.26 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 compare2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Krait 400
Clock1200 MHz2360 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 4
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameKrait 400
L1 Cache0 MB
L2 Cache2 MB
Technology28 nm
FeaturesAdreno 330 (578 MHz), LTE cat.4, UMTS, MBMS, GSM, CDMA2000, tD-SCDMA, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 4.0, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller (14.9 GB/s)
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 330 (578 MHz)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 4835     avg: 11759     median: 12722.5 (11%)     max: 15872 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2460     avg: 2632     median: 2619 (5%)     max: 2785 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 787     avg: 898     median: 919 (18%)     max: 957 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1953 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
934 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1839 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3592 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5502 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2540 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3717 Points (10%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
12 MFLOPS (0%)
min: 570     avg: 745     median: 760 (26%)     max: 978 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.5 MFLOPS (1%)
min: 64     avg: 277.5     median: 299.3 (29%)     max: 389.9 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 6933     avg: 9767     median: 8990 (11%)     max: 15700 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 516     avg: 786     median: 772.5 (8%)     max: 1107 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
534 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2407     avg: 3638     median: 3131 (3%)     max: 4950 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1530 Points (41%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1931 Points (43%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3015 Points (40%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1686 points (4%)
min: 13839     avg: 20472     median: 23532 (54%)     max: 24045 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 19844     avg: 26595     median: 26595 (62%)     max: 33346 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 38920     avg: 40385     median: 40385 (41%)     max: 41850 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
48967 Points (17%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 505     avg: 582     median: 566 (17%)     max: 674 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 13619     avg: 15486     median: 15735 (52%)     max: 17104 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 16857     avg: 17428     median: 17428 (2%)     max: 17999 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 3680     avg: 3910     median: 3774 (19%)     max: 4277 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB → 3373% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 07:33:23

#0 checking url part for id 3316 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4675 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.097s ... 0.098s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.098s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3316 +0.003s ... 0.102s

#7 got single benchmarks 3316 +0.008s ... 0.109s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4675 +0.004s ... 0.113s

#9 got single benchmarks 4675 +0.026s ... 0.139s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.139s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.091s ... 0.23s

#12 return log +0.084s ... 0.314s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)