Apple Silicon is well and truly in the minds of the wider tech world these days thanks to outsized performance advantage of its iPhones have enjoyed over the competition for many years now. It is a performance advantage that was subsequently hit home by processors like the 'X' variants of iPhone chips that were further bolstered for its iPad line (A8X, A10X, A12X, A14X/M1). Now, we have just held witness to how advanced Apple’s silicon technology is with the launch of the new M1 Pro and M1 Max chips, which are in a class of their own.
While the excellent Apple M1 chip launched last year in the MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro and Mac mini gave us some insight into what to expect from Apple’s 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro, Apple exceeded expectations with the M1 Pro and M1 Max. Although now clearly Apple’s entry-level Mac chip, the M1 was already competitive with some of Intel’s best laptop chips. But the new M1 Pro and M1 Max chips managed to blow away Anandtech, a specialist chip technology website, which recently said, “We expected large performance jumps, but we didn’t expect some of the monstrous increases the new chips are able to achieve.”
While Apple is already cooking up something that could be as much as four times as powerful as the M1 Max (or more) for the next Mac Pro, the M1 Pro and M1 Max are very much the culmination of a vision that dates back to 2008. Tony Fadell, the ‘Father of the iPod’, had already convinced the late Steve Jobs that Apple needed to adopt Arm-based chips for both its iPhone and iPad. Jobs is said to have initially planned on using Intel Atom in the first iPad as he had an affinity with the company, but Fadell famously threatened to leave Apple if Jobs went ahead with his plans instead of using Arm-based silicon which Fadell favored.
Apple’s senior leadership team at the time naturally included Steve Jobs, along with Tony Fadell, Jony Ive, Scott Forstall, Eddy Cue and Phil Schiller. It was this braintrust that made the decision to develop custom Arm-based chips to help differentiate the iPhone and iPad from the competition. While Apple had dabbled in processor design in partnership with other companies in the past, it made the decision to acquire P.A. Semi in 2008 to create an in-house team dedicated to custom chip design. At the time, P.A. Semi had a team of around 150 people and specialized in making powerful and efficient processors. Sound familiar?
Apple further bolstered this team with the subsequent acquisition of Intrinsity in 2010 which employed around 100 staff. Unsurprisingly, Intrinsity also specialized in creating highly efficient chips that needed fewer transistors and offered low power consumption. In an interesting aside, just prior to being acquired by Apple, Intrinsity had partnered with Samsung in 2009 to develop the 1 GHz Arm Cortex-A8 based chip found in the Google Nexus S. Apple must have liked what it saw in that design while Samsung must be kicking themselves that they didn’t take the opportunity to gobble up Instrinsity before Apple swept in.
The decision to go in-house, and acquire Intrinsity and P.A. Semi is why we now have Apple's devices unified under a single custom Apple architecture. And, of course, the incredible powerful M1 Pro and M1 Max chips, with more to come. To conclude the article, I will leave you with a tweet from Tony Fadell that he posted in response to a question in which I asked what he thought of the new M1 Pro and M1 Max chips:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
These processors (finally) set the Mac on the same timeline for rapid innovation - like the iPhone, iPad, Watch, Apple TV & AirPods. Apple’s unique capability allows for incredible tech SH/HW leverage across every product.
— Tony Fadell (@tfadell) November 3, 2021
Wonderful to see our vision from 2008 is in full bloom. https://t.co/wdwTtrEIVK
Source(s)
Own
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones