Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 305 vs Qualcomm Adreno 330

Qualcomm Adreno 305

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 305 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400- an S4 Plus-series (e. g. 8930ABSamsung Galaxy Mega 6.3). The Adreno 305 usually only offers half of the performance of the the Adreno 320 and is only slightly ahead of the Mali-400 MP4. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem.

Qualcomm Adreno 330

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 330

The Qualcomm Adreno 330 is a GPU for smartphones and tablets that is integrated into Qualcomm SoCs. It was introduced in the middle of 2013 and was primarily used for Android devices. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering. It supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and is mostly used in Android based smartphones and tablets.

The graphics clock rate of the Adreno 330 differs from the used SoC where it is built in. It ranges from 450 MHz in the Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, over 550 MHz in the MSM8974AB up to 578 MHz in the Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC. In addition, there are some architectural changes compared to the former Adreno 320 (e.g. more shader cores).

As a high-end GPU (in 2013) for Android based SoCs, the Adreno 330 is able to cope with even demanding games and high resolution displays. As you can see in our tests benchmarks below, the performance is similar to the PowerVR G6430 in the Apple A7 SoC.

We tested a Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 with a 450 MHz clocked Adreno 330 in a Acer Liquid S2 (see our review). The games run in 1920x1080 on this phablet and are therefore quite demanding.

Real Racing 3 was running quite good on some tracks in "high" settings (set with RR3 Graphics App) and stuttering on other tracks with many cars visible. In medium settings it ran fluently all the time. However battery consumption (25% in 3 races with a total runtime of 45 min) and heat development (max 42°C = 108°F) were quite high.

Fifa 14 and Angry Birds Go were also well playable although there was some slight stuttering visible in both games (may be caused by the game itself). Angry Birds Go also felt like running most of the times in lower fps regions.

The older but still demanding GTA 3 was no problem for the Liquid S2 as were less demanding games like Subway Surf or Temple Run 2. Especially the later two ran in high fps regions.

Qualcomm Adreno 305Qualcomm Adreno 330
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines6 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz450 - 578 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 9.0c, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 9_3, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology28 nm28 nm
Date of Announcement01.09.2012 07.01.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.qualcomm.com
CPU in Adreno 305GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89284 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80284 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB2 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 450 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 330GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC4 x 2450 MHz578 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB4 x 2360 MHz578 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB4 x 2360 MHz578 MHz? MHz
min. - max.450 - ? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

min: 10153     avg: 17810     median: 18007 (2%)     max: 22684 Points
min: 7283     avg: 9051     median: 9118 (1%)     max: 10768 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 3035     avg: 4947     median: 5238.5 (1%)     max: 5521 Points
min: 10184     avg: 15992     median: 17935 (2%)     max: 21680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
209 Points (1%)
974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
173 Points (0%)
1030 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
58 Points (1%)
min: 710     avg: 1030     median: 1116.5 (10%)     max: 1176 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
46 Points (0%)
min: 643     avg: 1006     median: 1089.5 (7%)     max: 1202 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 305
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 3.5     avg: 5.3     median: 5.7 (0%)     max: 6.2 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 330
min: 13     avg: 23.6     median: 24 (0%)     max: 28.1 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 756     avg: 1724     median: 1840 (64%)     max: 2156 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0
min: 4826     avg: 5231     median: 5231 (39%)     max: 5636 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3.0 3DRating Score
10143 Points (100%)
9637 Points (100%)
min: 11.9     avg: 14.1     median: 14.2 (67%)     max: 15.6 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 749     avg: 1438     median: 1433.5 (3%)     max: 1878 Points
min: 8851     avg: 11510     median: 11943 (27%)     max: 12943 Points
min: 17913     avg: 22815     median: 23230 (52%)     max: 25299 Points
min: 3414     avg: 4238     median: 4354 (95%)     max: 4568 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 305 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 330 → 578% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
100%
Adreno 305:
35  fps
high
100%
Adreno 305:
22  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 305:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 305:
29  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 305:
27  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
100%
Adreno 305:
36  fps
high
100%
Adreno 305:
34  fps
100%
Adreno 330:
34  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 305:
29  fps
103%
Adreno 330:
27 2392 x 1440 30 32 1920 x 1080 ~ 30 fps
Fifa 14 Mobile Android

Fifa 14 Mobile Android

2013
high
Adreno 330:
29 2392 x 1440 29.4 1920 x 1080 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 305:
29 1280x720  fps
97%
Adreno 330:
28 2392 x 1440  fps
high
100%
Adreno 305:
18 26 1280x720 ~ 22 fps
127%
Adreno 330:
27.7 2392 x 1440 28 1920 x 1080 28 29 1920x1080 ~ 28 fps
Gangstar Vegas

Gangstar Vegas

2013
ultra
Adreno 330:
16 2392 x 1440 20.3 1920 x 1080 ~ 18 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 305:
42 1280x720  fps
high
Adreno 330:
23 2392 x 1440 28.5 1920x1080  ~ 26 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 305:
60 720x1280  fps
98%
Adreno 330:
58  59 1440 x 2406 59 1920x1080 ~ 59 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 305:
55 720x1085  fps
96%
Adreno 330:
49 1440 x 2406 56 1920x1080  ~ 53 fps
Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

2011
low
Adreno 330:
24.5 2392 x 1440 27 1920 x 1080 ~ 26 fps
Minecraft - Pocket Edition

Minecraft - Pocket Edition

2011
ultra
Adreno 330:
45 2392 x 1440 57.9 1920 x 1080 ~ 51 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 305 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 330 → 104%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

Qualcomm Adreno 305lowmed.highultraQHD4K
World of Tanks Blitz3522
Arena of Valor3029
Shadow Fight 327
Battle Bay3634
Dead Trigger 229
Asphalt 8: Airborne2922
Real Racing 342
Temple Run 260
Subway Surfers55
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
4




3
2
1
1








Qualcomm Adreno 330lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Battle Bay34
Dead Trigger 230
Fifa 14 Mobile Android29
Asphalt 8: Airborne2828
Gangstar Vegas18
Real Racing 326
Temple Run 259
Subway Surfers53
Grand Theft Auto 3 Android26
Minecraft - Pocket Edition51
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2





3
4

1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 06. 08:55:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4683 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733471715s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:18:59 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0.014s ... 0.034s

#9 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.025s ... 0.059s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4683 +0s ... 0.059s

#11 got single benchmarks 4683 +0.02s ... 0.079s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.086s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.088s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.101s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.101s

#17 Got 38 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.109s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.109s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.111s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.119s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.119s

#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)