Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 302 vs Qualcomm Adreno 510

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

Qualcomm Adreno 510

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 510

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

Qualcomm Adreno 302Qualcomm Adreno 510
Adreno 500 Series
Adreno 330 compare 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology28 nm14 nm
Date of Announcement20.06.2013 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 500
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
CPU in Adreno 302GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM89768 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM89566 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 3543     avg: 3599     median: 3592 (0%)     max: 3678 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1951     avg: 1991     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4095     avg: 4219     median: 4171 (1%)     max: 4482 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1381     avg: 1454     median: 1441.5 (6%)     max: 1579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1354     avg: 1395     median: 1389.5 (3%)     max: 1459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
971 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
867 Points (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1.3 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 3.3     avg: 4.1     median: 4.4 (0%)     max: 4.5 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
34.3 fps (57%)
44.8 fps (74%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
1316 Points (3%)
15120 Points (34%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
3442 Points (8%)
26078 Points (58%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
49.7 fps (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2172     avg: 2356     median: 2297 (2%)     max: 2780 Points
6078 Points (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 540     avg: 574     median: 584 (1%)     max: 591 Points
2559 Points (4%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2536     avg: 2656     median: 2655.5 (58%)     max: 2775 Points
4270 Points (93%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 592% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 510:
30 50 57 60 ~ 49 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 510:
20 29 30 30 ~ 27 fps
Qualcomm Adreno 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 249
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 07. 14:26:35

#0 checking url part for id 5509 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:42:36 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.085s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.085s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.085s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5509 +0.029s ... 0.114s

#8 got single benchmarks 5509 +0.024s ... 0.137s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0.002s ... 0.139s

#10 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.041s ... 0.18s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.18s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.094s ... 0.274s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.274s

#14 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.281s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.281s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.282s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.287s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.287s

#19 return log +0.049s ... 0.336s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)