Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9210 vs Intel Celeron N3060

AMD A6-9210

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9210

The AMD A6-9210 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A6-9210 is the mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.4-2.8 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9210 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 600 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9210 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelAMD A6-9210Intel Celeron N3060
CodenameStoney RidgeBraswell
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Braswell
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 « 2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 « 1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 - 2800 MHz1600 - 2480 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketBGAFCBGA1170
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache2 MB
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (0%)     max: 74 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (11%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (8%)     max: 1275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (2%)     max: 2402 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
3426 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
1800 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3060 +
1361 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3060 +
43.1 s (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N3060 +
5.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N3060 +
28.4 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3060 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3060 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3060 +
0.5 GB/s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N3060 +
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N3060 +
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N3060 +
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (2%)     max: 1076 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
10140 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
8087 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
1124 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1127 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1911 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1708 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
913 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (6%)     max: 8303 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 04:57:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8182 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755399442s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8182 +0s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 8182 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.017s ... 0.029s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.043s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.044s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)