AMD A6-5357M vs AMD A10-5757M

AMD A6-5357M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5357M

The AMD A6-5357M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A6-5350M, the A6-5357M is a BGA version. As successor to the A6-4400M, the A6-5350M/5357M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.9 to 3.5 GHz, the A6-5357M should perform about 15 percent faster than the A6-4400M and just reach a Pentium P6100. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8450G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7520G at 533 - 720 MHz. With fast dual-channel memory, performance is expected to match a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A10-5757M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5757M

The AMD A10-5757M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A10-5750M, the 5757M is a BGA version. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M/5757M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5757M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A6-5357MAMD A10-5757M
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
RichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M compare2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M compare2100 - 2900 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M compare2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M compare2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M compare1700 - 2700 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M compare2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-5357M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M compare2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M compare2200 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M compare2000 - 2600 MHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M compare2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-5757M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M compare2100 - 2900 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M compare2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M compare2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M compare1700 - 2700 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M compare2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M compare2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M compare2200 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M compare2000 - 2600 MHz2 / 2
2900 - 3500 MHz2500 - 3500 MHz
1 MB4 MB
2 / 24 / 4
35 35
32 32
BGABGA
SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8650G (600 - 720 MHz)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 2.14     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (5%)     max: 2.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (34%)     max: 0.89 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
2182 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
3774 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
8232 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
3247 Points (28%)
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
min: 901.3     avg: 901.3     median: 901.3 (106%)     max: 847.8909912109375 seconds
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
min: 28.7     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (108%)     max: 26.520999908447266 seconds
WinRAR - Result
1266 KB/s (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
7.6 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
39.2 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
1.1 GB/s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
2986 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
min: 39     avg: 39     median: 39 (153%)     max: 25.5 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
min: 86     avg: 86     median: 86 (189%)     max: 45.599998474121094 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
min: 2237     avg: 2237     median: 2237 (243%)     max: 921.0999755859375 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
33372 MIPS (16%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
22906 MFLOPS (18%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
6493 Points (9%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 2533     avg: 2709.3     median: 2772 (13%)     max: 2823 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)