Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A5 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

Apple A5

► remove from comparison

The Apple A5 is a dual-core processor that contains two Cortex A9 cores. Each core is max. clocked at 900 MHz. Furthermore, the A5 integrates a relative fast PowerVR SGX 543MP2 graphics card and 512MB ram (in the same package for the iPad 2). Apple states a maximum of 2x the performance compared to the previous single core Apple A4.

Texas Instruments OMAP 4470

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4470

The OMAP 4470 is a fourth generation SoC (System on Chip) developed by Texas Instruments (TI) for use in mobile phones and tablets. The 45 nm chip includes dual ARM Cortex-A9 CPU cores running at 1.3 GHz up to 1.8 GHz on an ARM v7 instruction set and ARM NEON SIMD (Single instruction, multiple data) engine. 

The SoC integrates an SGX540 GPU from PowerVR clocked at 277 - 384 MHz, which can utilize the same 400 MHz dual-channel LPDDR2 memory controller as the two core processors. Compared to the OMAP 4430, the 4470 is clocked higher on both the CPU and GPU.

ModelApple A5Texas Instruments OMAP 4470
SeriesApple
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Series: Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
» Apple A51 GHz2 Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A51 GHz2 Cortex A9
Clock1000 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads22 / 2
Technology40, 32 nm45 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache1 MB
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
A5 +
min: 297     avg: 317.7     median: 323 (3%)     max: 333 Points
min: 436     avg: 438     median: 438 (4%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
A5 +
min: 751     avg: 807     median: 833 (8%)     max: 838 Points
min: 1302     avg: 1326     median: 1325.5 (12%)     max: 1349 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
A5 +
min: 737     avg: 855     median: 906 (2%)     max: 923 Points
min: 1895     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (4%)     max: 1963 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
A5 +
min: 552     avg: 638     median: 671 (1%)     max: 691 Points
min: 1118     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (2%)     max: 1153 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
A5 +
min: 631     avg: 715     median: 750 (2%)     max: 764 Points
min: 1367     avg: 1381     median: 1381 (4%)     max: 1395 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
A5 +
min: 124.4     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (4%)     max: 129.8 MFLOPS
min: 80.5     avg: 87.6     median: 87.6 (3%)     max: 94.6 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
A5 +
min: 78.1     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (8%)     max: 85.4 MFLOPS
min: 52.5     avg: 55.4     median: 55.4 (5%)     max: 58.3 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
A5 +
min: 1557     avg: 1863     median: 1888.5 (18%)     max: 2118 ms
min: 1438     avg: 1497     median: 1497 (14%)     max: 1556 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2747     avg: 3447     median: 3447 (8%)     max: 4147 points

Average Benchmarks Apple A5 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 → 138% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 07:09:06

#0 checking url part for id 2331 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3647 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.055s ... 0.056s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.06s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.06s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.06s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 2331 +0s ... 0.06s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#16 got single benchmarks 2331 +0.007s ... 0.068s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 3647 +0.001s ... 0.069s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.07s

#20 got single benchmarks 3647 +0.006s ... 0.076s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.081s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#60 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.083s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.033s ... 0.116s

#62 return log +0.004s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)