Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-4355M vs AMD A10-5757M vs AMD A8-4500M

AMD A4-4355M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-4355M

The AMD A4-4355M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage (ULV) dual-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q4 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 1.9 GHz CPU (up to 2.4 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a Radeon HD 7400G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a dual-core processor, the A4-4355M includes only one module with two integer-cores and a floating-point core. As a result, the CPU is not a true dual-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A4-4355M performs significantly faster than the E-Series (e.g. E2-1800) and competes with Intels Celeron and Pentium ULV processors. CPU performance from the AMD processor should be sufficient for all daily workloads like Office and Internet browsing, but will reach its limits in more demanding applications and multitasking.

The APU integrates a DirectX 11-compatible GPU called Radeon HD 7400G.

The power consumption of the A4-4355M APU is rated at 17 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to Intels ULV-processors. Consequently, the A4-4355M is best suited for thin-and-light notebooks.

AMD A10-5757M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5757M

The AMD A10-5757M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A10-5750M, the 5757M is a BGA version. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M/5757M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5757M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A8-4500M

► remove from comparison AMD A8-4500M

The AMD A8-4500M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q2 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 1.9 GHz CPU (up to 2.8 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a relatively fast Radeon HD 7640G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a quad-core processor, the A8-4500M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A8-4500M performs similar to the Llano-based A8-3500M. Single-threaded workloads can especially benefit from the new architecture and the updated Turbo Core functionality. If compared to Intels Core-i3-series, the A8-4500M offers less performance in most cases. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor should be sufficient for all daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and even light video editing or gaming.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7640G offers only 256 shader cores of the Trinity chip (7660G: 384) and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 497 to 686 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7640G GPU is comparable to a dedicated Radeon HD 7610M and is even faster than the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A8-4500M APU is rated at 35 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to mid-range dual-core Ivy Bridge processors. Consequently, the A8-4500M is best suited for 14-inch notebooks or larger.

ModelAMD A4-4355MAMD A10-5757MAMD A8-4500M
CodenameTrinityRichlandTrinity
SeriesAMD AMD A-SeriesAMD AMD A-SeriesAMD AMD A-Series
Series: AMD A-Series Trinity
AMD A10-4600M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4657M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4655M2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4500M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4557M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4555M1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-4400M2.7 - 3.2 GHzcores
AMD A4-4300M2.5 - 3 GHzcores
AMD A6-4455M2.1 - 2.6 GHzcores
AMD A4-4355M « 1.9 - 2.4 GHzcores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M « 2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-4600M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4657M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4655M2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4500M « 1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4557M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4555M1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-4400M2.7 - 3.2 GHzcores
AMD A4-4300M2.5 - 3 GHzcores
AMD A6-4455M2.1 - 2.6 GHzcores
AMD A4-4355M1.9 - 2.4 GHzcores
Clock1900 - 2400 MHz2500 - 3500 MHz1900 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 44 / 4
TDP17 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors1303 Million1303 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size246 mm2246 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMASSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7400G (327 - 424 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8650G (600 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
SocketBGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.7 Points (1%)
min: 2.14     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.31 Points
min: 1.68     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (2%)     max: 1.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.5 Points (12%)
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.89 Points
min: 0.56     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (17%)     max: 0.71 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1690 Points (10%)
2182 Points (13%)
min: 1709     avg: 1804     median: 1820.5 (11%)     max: 1862 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2318 Points (2%)
3774 Points (3%)
min: 4536     avg: 4825     median: 4872 (4%)     max: 4950 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3120 Points (2%)
8232 Points (5%)
min: 6524     avg: 6770     median: 6795 (4%)     max: 6958 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2108 Points (3%)
3247 Points (4%)
min: 2355     avg: 2476     median: 2475.5 (3%)     max: 2593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
2128 s (25%)
901 s (11%)
min: 1001     avg: 1028     median: 1039 (12%)     max: 1039 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
63.5 s (13%)
28.7 s (6%)
min: 30.61     avg: 31.2     median: 31.5 (6%)     max: 31.64 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
884 Points (1%)
1266 Points (2%)
1777 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
7.6 fps (0%)
10.8 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
39.2 fps (1%)
58.4 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.5 GB/s (1%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1239 Points (3%)
2986 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22 s (5%)
39 s (8%)
min: 34.59     avg: 38.5     median: 40.8 (9%)     max: 41.28 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
95 s (4%)
86 s (4%)
min: 78.2     avg: 87.1     median: 91.9 (4%)     max: 93.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2448 s (11%)
2237 s (10%)
min: 2034     avg: 2306     median: 2396 (11%)     max: 2431 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
33372 MIPS (16%)
min: 26660     avg: 27698     median: 26700 (13%)     max: 30470 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
22906 MFLOPS (18%)
min: 18760     avg: 19672     median: 18780 (14%)     max: 23120 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
6.7 Points (86%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6493 Points (5%)
min: 5119     avg: 5399     median: 5348 (4%)     max: 5665 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
994 Points (2%)
min: 2533     avg: 2709     median: 2772 (7%)     max: 2823 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
9328 Points (8%)
min: 18472     avg: 19251     median: 19286 (16%)     max: 19813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
718 Points (2%)
min: 1514     avg: 1548     median: 1540 (4%)     max: 1600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
922 Points (2%)
min: 2129     avg: 2163     median: 2149 (4%)     max: 2242 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 4131     avg: 4177     median: 4131 (22%)     max: 4270 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 3032     avg: 3107     median: 3032 (21%)     max: 3257 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 5242     avg: 5272     median: 5242 (10%)     max: 5332 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 3925     avg: 3972     median: 3925 (8%)     max: 4065 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 4227     avg: 4274     median: 4227 (11%)     max: 4367 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A4-4355M → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5757M → 195% n=17

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-4500M → 179% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 01. 19:31:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3517 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3747 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3318 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759339902s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3517 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 3517 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3747 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 3747 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3318 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#13 got single benchmarks 3318 +0.008s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.056s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)