Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-4300M vs AMD A8-5550M

AMD A4-4300M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-4300M

The AMD A4-4300M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 2.5 GHz CPU (up to 3.0 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a Radeon HD 7420G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a dual-core processor, the A4-4300M includes only one module with two integer-cores and one floating-point core. As a result, the CPU is not a true dual-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A4-4300M performs similar to the Llano-based A4-3310MX. Single-threaded workloads can especially benefit from the new architecture and the updated Turbo Core functionality. If compared to Intels Pentium-series, the A4-4300M offers less performance in most cases. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor is sufficient for all daily workloads like Office and Internet browsing, but will reach its limits in more demanding applications.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7420G offers probably only 192 shader cores of the Trinity chip (7660G: 384) and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 470 to 640 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7420G GPU is somewhere between the Llano-based Radeon HD 6520G and the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A4-4300M APU is rated at 35 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to dual-core Ivy Bridge processors. Consequently, the A4-4300M is best suited for 14-inch notebooks or larger.

AMD A8-5550M

► remove from comparison AMD A8-5550M

The AMD A8-5550M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A8-4500M, the A8-5550M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the lower middle class. The APU integrates 4 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.1 to 3.1 GHz, the A8-5550M performs about 15 percent slower than the A10-5750M and similar to a Core i3-2310M. Consequently, the performance in current applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8550G offers 256 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7640G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance matches a dedicated Radeon HD 7570M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

ModelAMD A4-4300MAMD A8-5550M
CodenameTrinityRichland
SeriesAMD AMD A-SeriesAMD AMD A-Series
Series: AMD A-Series Richland
AMD A10-4600M compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4657M compare2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4655M compare2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4500M compare1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4557M compare1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4555M compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-4400M compare2.7 - 3.2 GHzcores
AMD A4-4300M « 2.5 - 3 GHzcores
AMD A6-4455M compare2.1 - 2.6 GHzcores
AMD A4-4355M compare1.9 - 2.4 GHzcores
AMD A10-5750M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M compare2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M « 2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 - 3000 MHz2100 - 3100 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors1303 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size246 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMASSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7420G (480 - 655 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8550G (515 - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
93 Points (1%)
188 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
60 Points (17%)
68 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.03     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.05 Points
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (3%)     max: 2.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.7 Points (16%)
min: 0.78     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (19%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1779     avg: 1997     median: 1996.5 (12%)     max: 2214 Points
min: 2139     avg: 2276     median: 2321 (14%)     max: 2368 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3140     avg: 3144     median: 3144 (2%)     max: 3148 Points
min: 5334     avg: 5702     median: 5844 (4%)     max: 5929 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2127     avg: 3161     median: 3161 (2%)     max: 4195 Points
min: 7526     avg: 7930     median: 8077 (5%)     max: 8186 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2283     avg: 2613     median: 2613 (3%)     max: 2943 Points
min: 2902     avg: 3081     median: 3155 (4%)     max: 3187 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1619 s (19%)
min: 863     avg: 900     median: 891 (11%)     max: 947 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.4 s (10%)
min: 25.3     avg: 26.2     median: 26 (5%)     max: 27.18 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1072 Points (2%)
min: 1902     avg: 1933     median: 1932.5 (3%)     max: 1963 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
6631 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2646 MIPS (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
7.1 fps (0%)
min: 13.3     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (0%)     max: 13.67 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
36 fps (1%)
min: 67     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (2%)     max: 74.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.141     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.148 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.256     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.269 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.6 GB/s (2%)
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3223 Seconds (23%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1671     avg: 1684     median: 1684 (4%)     max: 1697 Points
min: 2768     avg: 2854     median: 2795 (6%)     max: 2999 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
33.9 s (7%)
min: 31.4     avg: 31.5     median: 31.4 (7%)     max: 31.61 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
75.6 s (3%)
min: 71     avg: 71.1     median: 71 (3%)     max: 71.4 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2066 s (9%)
min: 1849     avg: 1852     median: 1851.5 (8%)     max: 1854 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
16680 MIPS (8%)
29660 MIPS (14%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
11210 MFLOPS (9%)
20870 MFLOPS (16%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.2 Points (67%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3254 Points (2%)
min: 6035     avg: 6251     median: 6321 (5%)     max: 6398 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1355 Points (3%)
min: 2274     avg: 2437     median: 2503 (6%)     max: 2535 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
12469 Points (10%)
min: 19496     avg: 21244     median: 21872 (18%)     max: 22365 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
22155 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
25741 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
996 Points (3%)
min: 1662     avg: 1771     median: 1777 (4%)     max: 1869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1359 Points (2%)
min: 2350     avg: 2492     median: 2489 (4%)     max: 2641 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
395 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1073 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2115 Points (4%)
4417 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1512 Points (20%)
1691 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2965 Points (16%)
4680 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2978 Points (21%)
3498 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3696 Points (7%)
4514 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2855 Points (6%)
4814 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3184 Points (8%)
4432 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2921     avg: 3334     median: 2939 (3%)     max: 4141 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 185.5     avg: 235.7     median: 235.7 (3%)     max: 285.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8435     avg: 11020     median: 11019.5 (7%)     max: 13604 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65.3 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A4-4300M → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-5550M → 167% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 03. 03:20:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3337 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3779 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1762136455s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Nov 2025 05:19:33 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3337 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 3337 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3779 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 3779 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.053s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)