Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A18 Pro vs Apple M3

Apple A18 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple A18 Pro

The Apple A18 Pro is a powerful smartphone processor and formal successor to the A17 Pro. This new member of the Apple A processor series debuted in September 2024 alongside the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max; it features 2 performance cores and 4 efficient cores along with a 35 TOPS NPU and the 6-core A18 Pro GPU.

The chip is said to be in large part based on the v9.2A ARM microarchitecture for near-Apple M4 IPC. 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, various satellite navigation systems and NFC are all supported here.

The more affordable A18 SoC has the same 2 P-cores and 4 E-cores running at slightly lower clock speeds along with a significantly slower graphics adapter. The Pro version of the chip also boasts USB 3.x support whereas devices powered by the A18 are limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

Performance

Its multi-thread benchmark scores leave the Dimensity 9300 as well as the Apple A17 Pro and the Apple A18 pretty far behind with at least a 10% advantage. Overall, Apple M1-like performance is to be expected in short-term workloads.

In the meantime, its single-thread performance comes dangerously close to the M3 and M4 chips despite their higher clocks speeds and slightly more advanced architectures. (The A18 Pro's performance cores can run at just slightly over 4.0 GHz, as far as we know.)

Performance drops are inevitable when under longer-term stress since there is no active cooling solution of any kind here.

Graphics

Like any modern graphics adapter, the 6-core A18 Pro GPU is RT-enabled. It delivers benchmark scores that are most comparable to the Immortalis-G720 MP12, Adreno 740 and Adreno 750; as a matter of fact, it even manages to beat the 7-core M1 GPU in many tests which is rather impressive. Any 2024 and 2025 iOS game will be happy with such an iGPU.

Power consumption

It appears the chip is able to briefly consume up to about 10 W when under high load, with average sustained power consumption figures hovering around 4 W.

The pretty modern TSMC N3E manufacturing process makes the A-series chip very power-efficient, as of late 2024.

Apple M3

► remove from comparison Apple M3

The Apple M3 is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced in late 2023. It integrates a new 8-core CPU with 4 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores running at up to 2.75 GHz. Apple claims that the CPU is up to 20% faster than in the old Apple M2 (3.5 GHz)

Due to the higher clock speeds and architecture improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 in benchmarks (see e.g. Geekbench below) and can keep up with the fastest CPUs in short single-core tests (like the Raptor Lake i9-13950HX).

The M3 also integrates a new graphics adapter with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration called Apple M3 10-Core GPU. According to Apple, it is 20% faster than the GPU in the M2. The chip integrates again 10 GPU cores, but the cheaper variant only offers 8 cores (e.g. in the entry iMac). Later in early 2025 Apple also introduced a 9-core variant in the new iPad Air models. Furthermore, the GPU only supports 2 displays (an additional 6K60 display to the internal one).

Both GPU and CPU can access the unified memory on the package together. It is still available in 8, 16 and 24 GB variants and offers the same 100 GB/s maximum bandwidth (unlike the Pro models that feature a reduced memory bandwidth). 

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (versus 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded.

Unfortunately, the integrated wireless network module only supports Wi-Fi 6E (no Wi-Fi 7) and due to the support of only a single external monitor, the chip also has to make do with no Thunderbolt 4 (Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4 support only for up to 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured on the current 3nm TSMC process (N3B most likely) and contains 25 billion transistors (+25% vs. Apple M2). The 3nm process should also contribute to the excellent efficiency of the chip. Under load, the M3 CPU consumes approximately 20 Watt.

ModelApple A18 ProApple M3
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesApple M3
Series: M3
Apple A18 Pro « - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 compare - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic compare2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple M3 Max 16-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M3 « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock <=4000 MHz2748 - 4056 MHz
Cores / Threads6 / 6
2 x 4.0 GHz Apple A18 P-Core
4 x 2.2 GHz Apple A18 E-Core
8 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
TDP Turbo PL210 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm
Features16-core Neural Engine, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps)ARMv8 Instruction Set
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L2 Cache4 MB
Transistors25000 Million
iGPUApple M3 10-Core GPU
Manufacturerwww.apple.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 140     avg: 141     median: 141 (79%)     max: 142 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 576     avg: 622     median: 599.5 (11%)     max: 712 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 10074     avg: 10275     median: 10298 (10%)     max: 10454 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 1900     avg: 1901     median: 1900 (80%)     max: 1904 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M3 +
504 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M3 +
2818 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M3 +
1499 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M3 +
271 Points (75%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 491     avg: 590     median: 517 (7%)     max: 761 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 474     avg: 509     median: 494 (3%)     max: 558 Seconds
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3443     avg: 3461     median: 3461 (86%)     max: 3479 Points
88%
M3 +
min: 2994     avg: 3057     median: 3054 (76%)     max: 3130 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 8524     avg: 8546     median: 8546 (33%)     max: 8568 Points
140%
M3 +
min: 11752     avg: 11921     median: 11966 (46%)     max: 12066 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2437 Points (95%)
93%
M3 +
min: 1286     avg: 2092     median: 2256 (88%)     max: 2350 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6687 Points (12%)
158%
M3 +
min: 10402     avg: 10603     median: 10570 (19%)     max: 10774 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 276.9     avg: 278.2     median: 278.2 (0%)     max: 279.4 ms
77%
M3 +
min: 322.8     avg: 350.3     median: 362.8 (0%)     max: 373.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 98997     avg: 99683     median: 99682.5 (73%)     max: 100368 Points
97%
M3 +
min: 92645     avg: 95595     median: 96622 (71%)     max: 98093 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 267     avg: 269     median: 269 (74%)     max: 271 Points
117%
M3 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (86%)     max: 315 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
347 Points (62%)
128%
M3 +
min: 423     avg: 438.7     median: 445 (80%)     max: 448 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 1739820     avg: 1803560     median: 1803560 (60%)     max: 1867310 Points
116%
M3 +
min: 2045290     avg: 2096340     median: 2096340 (70%)     max: 2147390 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 476280     avg: 482239     median: 482238 (14%)     max: 488197 Points
115%
M3 +
min: 538633     avg: 555031     median: 555030 (16%)     max: 571428 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 M3 +
min: 21270     avg: 21339     median: 21339 (3%)     max: 21408 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1455     avg: 1486     median: 1486 (56%)     max: 1517 Points
124%
M3 +
min: 1847     avg: 1850     median: 1847 (69%)     max: 1857 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 3.94     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (2%)     max: 5.13 Watt
57%
1 M3 +
min: 7.79     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (3%)     max: 8.01 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 2.63     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 2.87 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 0.615     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.638 Watt
16%
1 M3 +
min: 2.6     avg: 3.7     median: 3.9 (4%)     max: 4.7 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple A18 Pro → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 → 114% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 12. 07:32:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18006 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15110 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754976721s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18006 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 18006 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15110 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 15110 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.039s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)