Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A13 Bionic vs Intel Core i3-10100Y

Apple A13 Bionic

► remove from comparison Apple A13 Bionic

The Apple A13 Bionic is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the iPhone 11 series. It was announced late 2019 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A12 Bionic, the A13 should offer a 20% improved CPU performance at 40% lower power (according to Apple).

With 8.5 billion transistors, the A13 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 (3 Billion) or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc (1.75 Billion).

Intel Core i3-10100Y

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100Y

The Intel Core i3-10100Y is a efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled laptops based on the old Amber Lake generation from 2018. It was announced in Q1 2021 and is similar to the old Core i5-8200Y. The only difference is a slightly higher GPU clock (+50 MHz).

The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.3 - 3.9 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The average 10100Y in our database is just a little ahead of the AMD 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, the latter being an entry-level, dual-core processor of the same energy efficiency based on the Zen architecture. This makes the Core i3 an OK option for basic day-to-day activities, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 615 iGPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) not unlike the older HD Graphics 515 and runs at up to 1,000 MHz. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power consumption

This little Core i3 here has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 5 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 3.5 W and 7 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, the values are low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs and handhelds.

The i3-10100Y is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel manufacturing processes for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelApple A13 BionicIntel Core i3-10100Y
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesIntel Amber Lake
CodenameLightning and ThunderAmber Lake-Y
Clock <=2660 MHz1300 - 3900 MHz
L1 Cache832 KB128 KB
L2 Cache12 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads6 / 62 / 4
Transistors6900 Million
Technology7 nm14 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUApple A13 Bionic GPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
L3 Cache4 MB
TDP5 Watt
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1377
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10100Y
23 pt (32%)
Intel Core i3-10100Y
23
max:
72.1 213%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1375 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
788 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
303 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
536 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
220 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
122 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5292 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9659 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
632 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1683 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8262 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3535 MIPS (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1825 Seconds (13%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1 sec (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
667 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3210 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 33851     avg: 33885     median: 33881 (29%)     max: 33925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2078     avg: 2803     median: 2958 (35%)     max: 3219 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3411     avg: 3780     median: 3877 (44%)     max: 4052 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1326     avg: 1333     median: 1332 (56%)     max: 1342 Points
986 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3235     avg: 3381     median: 3378.5 (6%)     max: 3531 Points
1889 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1343     avg: 1343     median: 1343 (6%)     max: 1344 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3242     avg: 3427     median: 3463 (11%)     max: 3575 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4359 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7643 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 545     avg: 562     median: 571 (1%)     max: 573 ms
1246 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 47288     avg: 48727     median: 48991 (44%)     max: 49388 Points
34086 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 146     avg: 179.2     median: 183 (38%)     max: 202 Points
148 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 10494     avg: 12510     median: 12592 (39%)     max: 14443 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 77118     avg: 77810     median: 78032 (96%)     max: 78279 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 218738     avg: 219891     median: 218937 (68%)     max: 221998 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 147281     avg: 149542     median: 148191 (91%)     max: 153154 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 456891     avg: 459752     median: 459850 (81%)     max: 462516 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 64361     avg: 75201     median: 78294 (65%)     max: 82947 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 67691     avg: 75819     median: 74262 (60%)     max: 85504 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 190559     avg: 203672     median: 209164 (38%)     max: 211292 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 149088     avg: 156731     median: 152919 (55%)     max: 168185 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 489463     avg: 511422     median: 510245 (49%)     max: 534558 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
622382 Points (38%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
147649 Points (40%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 650706     avg: 678820     median: 683897 (90%)     max: 701856 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 776     avg: 835     median: 849 (33%)     max: 864 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
18.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
2.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Apple A13 Bionic → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100Y → 76% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 15:19:38

#0 checking url part for id 11496 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13831 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11496 +0.002s ... 0.025s

#7 got single benchmarks 11496 +0.012s ... 0.036s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13831 +0.014s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 13831 +0.007s ... 0.057s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.133s ... 0.19s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.211s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)