, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A10-5745M vs AMD A8-5550M

AMD A10-5745M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5745M

The AMD A10-5745M is a mobile low-voltage quad-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates two modules with 2.1 to 2.9 GHz, a Radeon HD 8610G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A10-5745M should be similar to a Core i3-2310M. Thus, the APU is sufficiently for most modern applications and many games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8610G offers all 384 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD 7660G. The core is clocked at 533-626 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 25 watts, which is slightly below common middle-class CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for slim 13-inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A8-5550M

► remove from comparison AMD A8-5550M

The AMD A8-5550M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A8-4500M, the A8-5550M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the lower middle class. The APU integrates 4 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.1 to 3.1 GHz, the A8-5550M performs about 15 percent slower than the A10-5750M and similar to a Core i3-2310M. Consequently, the performance in current applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8550G offers 256 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7640G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance matches a dedicated Radeon HD 7570M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A10-5745MAMD A8-5550M
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
RichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
2100 - 2900 MHz2100 - 3100 MHz
4 MB4 MB
4 / 44 / 4
25 35
32 32
SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8610G (533 - 626 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8550G (515 - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 176     avg: 177     median: 177 (2%)     max: 178 Points
188 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 63     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (23%)     max: 64 Points
68 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.91     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (4%)     max: 1.93 Points
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (4%)     max: 2.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (22%)     max: 0.72 Points
min: 0.78     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (25%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2059     avg: 2065     median: 2065 (18%)     max: 2071
min: 2139     avg: 2276     median: 2321 (21%)     max: 2368
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5429     avg: 5480     median: 5480 (9%)     max: 5531
min: 5334     avg: 5702     median: 5844 (9%)     max: 5929
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7526     avg: 7930     median: 8077 (8%)     max: 8186 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2902     avg: 3081     median: 3155 (22%)     max: 3187 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
940 s (11%)
min: 863     avg: 900     median: 890.7 (11%)     max: 947.232 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35 s (7%)
min: 25.3     avg: 26.2     median: 26 (5%)     max: 27.178 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1585 (10%)
min: 1902     avg: 1933     median: 1932.5 (12%)     max: 1963
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
6631 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2646 MIPS (38%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12.7 fps (6%)
min: 13.3     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (6%)     max: 13.67 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
62.1 fps (18%)
min: 67     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (21%)     max: 74.18 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (5%)
min: 0.141     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (6%)     max: 0.148 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (6%)
min: 0.256     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.269 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (4%)
1.3 GB/s (5%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3223 Seconds (23%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2745 (15%)     max: 2770 Points
min: 2768     avg: 2854     median: 2795 (15%)     max: 2999 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
34.4 s (7%)
min: 31.4     avg: 31.5     median: 31.4 (7%)     max: 31.606 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
79 s (3%)
min: 71     avg: 71.2     median: 71 (3%)     max: 71.448 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2040 s (9%)
min: 1848.53     avg: 1851     median: 1851.5 (8%)     max: 1854.41 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
29660 MIPS (14%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
20870 MFLOPS (16%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6082 Points (7%)
min: 6035     avg: 6251     median: 6321 (7%)     max: 6398 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2103     avg: 2190     median: 2155 (8%)     max: 2311 Points
min: 2274     avg: 2437     median: 2503 (9%)     max: 2535 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 20181     avg: 21592     median: 21774 (14%)     max: 22821 Points
min: 19496     avg: 21244     median: 21872 (14%)     max: 22365 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
22155 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
25741 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1807     avg: 1843     median: 1831 (5%)     max: 1892 Points
min: 1662     avg: 1771     median: 1777 (4%)     max: 1869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2576     avg: 2615     median: 2619 (7%)     max: 2651 Points
min: 2350     avg: 2492     median: 2489 (6%)     max: 2641 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3012 Points (24%)
4680 Points (38%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2483 Points (23%)
3498 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5572 Points (11%)
4514 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4319 Points (9%)
4814 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4259 Points (11%)
4432 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3647     avg: 3724     median: 3724 (7%)     max: 3801
4417 (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1460     avg: 1476     median: 1476 (30%)     max: 1492
1691 (35%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
395 (21%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1073 (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4634.3     avg: 5294     median: 5294 (9%)     max: 5953.6 ms
min: 2921     avg: 3334     median: 2939 (5%)     max: 4141 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 226.8     avg: 243     median: 243.3 (3%)     max: 259.8 ms
min: 185.5     avg: 236     median: 235.7 (3%)     max: 285.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5708     avg: 6638     median: 6638 (10%)     max: 7568 Points
min: 8435     avg: 11020     median: 11019.5 (16%)     max: 13604 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65.3 Points (22%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5745M → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-5550M → 111% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 03. 12:19:08

#0 checking url part for id 4158 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3779 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Aug 2021 13:08:38 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.014s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4158 +0s ... 0.015s

#7 got single benchmarks 4158 +0.01s ... 0.024s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3779 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#9 got single benchmarks 3779 +0.011s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.065s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)