Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium 967 vs Intel Pentium B970

Intel Pentium 967

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium 967 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, Virtualization (VT-x, VT-d), HyperThreading, AES or Trusted Execution are deactivated. The Pentium 967 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked from 350 - 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Pentium 967 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore faster than a 1.3 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 967 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Pentium B970

► remove from comparison Intel B970

The Intel Pentium B970 is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part, HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization (VT-x and VT-d), Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync are deactivated. The Pentium B970 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 clocked at 650 / 1100 (with Turbo Boost).

The performance of the Pentium B970 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU. Therefore, the B960 should perform about 10% better than a Pentium P6300.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and DDR3-1333 memory controller.

ModelIntel Pentium 967Intel Pentium B970
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Pentium Sandy Bridge
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B9702.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B960 compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B940 compare2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 977 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium 9671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium B9702.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B960 compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B940 compare2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 977 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 9671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock1300 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketBGA1023rPGA988B
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Pentium 967Intel Pentium B970
Transistors624 Million
Die Size149 mm2
$125 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
967 +
1 Points (2%)
184%
B970 +
min: 1.66     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 1.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 B970 +
0.8 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
967 +
1640 Points (15%)
180%
B970 +
min: 2881     avg: 2943     median: 2954 (26%)     max: 2995 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
967 +
3038 Points (4%)
188%
B970 +
min: 5665     avg: 5726     median: 5697 (8%)     max: 5816 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
967 +
3816 Points (3%)
183%
B970 +
min: 6721     avg: 6925     median: 6989 (6%)     max: 7066 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
967 +
2116 Points (13%)
174%
B970 +
min: 3389     avg: 3589     median: 3681 (22%)     max: 3696 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
967 +
1872 s (22%)
112%
B970 +
min: 1070     avg: 1254     median: 1072 (13%)     max: 1621 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
967 +
58.6 s (12%)
105%
B970 +
min: 34.61     avg: 39.6     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 48.33 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
967 +
1319 Points (3%)
176%
B970 +
min: 2306     avg: 2321     median: 2328 (5%)     max: 2329 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
967 +
30.4 s (7%)
103%
B970 +
min: 17.6     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (4%)     max: 17.83 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
967 +
67.1 s (3%)
101%
B970 +
min: 39.64     avg: 40.3     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 40.78 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
967 +
1534 s (7%)
103%
B970 +
min: 894     avg: 904     median: 904 (4%)     max: 913 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
967 +
16130 MIPS (8%)
175%
B970 +
min: 28100     avg: 28285     median: 28285 (13%)     max: 28470 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
967 +
9310 MFLOPS (7%)
177%
B970 +
min: 16500     avg: 16505     median: 16505 (13%)     max: 16510 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
967 +
4.3 Points (55%)
144%
B970 +
6.2 Points (79%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B970 +
min: 5141     avg: 5254     median: 5242 (5%)     max: 5380 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 B970 +
1989 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium 967 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium B970 → 150% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 11. 01:41:38

#0 checking url part for id 3334 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3017 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3334 +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#22 got single benchmarks 3334 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 3017 +0s ... 0.017s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#25 got single benchmarks 3017 +0.009s ... 0.026s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.027s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#83 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.037s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#85 return log +0.004s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)