Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 2955U vs Intel Celeron 2957U

Intel Celeron 2955U

► remove from comparison Intel 2955U

The Intel Celeron 2955U is an entry level, ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor clocked at 1.4 GHz which has been presented in fall 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are deactivated.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2955U is similar to the old and slightly higher clocked Celeron 1007U, which is based on Ivy Bridge. The CPU has sufficient power for simple office and multimedia purposes.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 1000 MHz (clocks not confirmed yet), making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4400 and HD Graphics 5000 of other Haswell ULV models.

The Celeron 2955U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Celeron 2957U

► remove from comparison Intel 2957U

The Intel Celeron 2957U is an entry level, ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor clocked at 1.4 GHz which has been presented in Q1 2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are deactivated. In contrast to the very similar Celeron 2955U, the 2957U supports Wireless Display (WiDi) as well as Quick Sync.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2957U is similar to the old and slightly higher clocked Celeron 1007U, which is based on Ivy Bridge. The CPU has sufficient power for simple office and multimedia purposes.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 1000 MHz, making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4400 and HD Graphics 5000 of other Haswell ULV models.

The Celeron 2957U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

ModelIntel Celeron 2955UIntel Celeron 2957U
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameHaswellHaswell
Series: Celeron Haswell
Intel Celeron 2970M compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2950M compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2981U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2980U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2957U1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2955U « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2961Y compare1.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2970M compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2950M compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2981U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2980U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2957U « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2955U1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 2961Y compare1.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock1400 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
SocketBGA1168BGA1168
FeaturesHD Graphics (200 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, VirtualizationHD Graphics (200 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, Virtualization, Wireless Display, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2957U +
105 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 2957U +
55 Points (17%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (1%)
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.6 Points (15%)
0.6 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2069 Points (13%)
2077 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4000 Points (3%)
4043 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
5117 Points (4%)
5080 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2666 Points (3%)
2714 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1693 s (20%)
1686 s (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
53.2 s (11%)
53.5 s (11%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1054 Points (2%)
1058 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
7.5 fps (3%)
7.6 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
40.7 fps (9%)
41.3 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 2955U +
1520 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
26.6 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
58.9 s (3%)
59 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1322 s (6%)
1303 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23260 MIPS (11%)
24000 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
10310 MFLOPS (8%)
10450 MFLOPS (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 2955U +
5.5 Points (71%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 2955U +
3854 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1604 Points (4%)
1524 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
10956 Points (9%)
11407 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1002 Points (3%)
992 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1343 Points (2%)
1342 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2220 Points (4%)
2208 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1277 Points (25%)
1283 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4412 Points (36%)
4377 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3615 Points (33%)
3572 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2343 Points (5%)
2380 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2104 Points (4%)
2385 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2720 Points (7%)
2819 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 2955U +
2564 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 2955U +
min: 345.1     avg: 382.6     median: 347.4 (4%)     max: 455.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 2955U +
min: 8758     avg: 10383     median: 10383 (9%)     max: 12008 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 2955U → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 2957U → 101% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 11. 00:52:19

#0 checking url part for id 4468 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4743 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:37:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4468 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 4468 +0.025s ... 0.061s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4743 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#9 got single benchmarks 4743 +0.008s ... 0.071s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.203s ... 0.273s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.296s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)