Intel Celeron 2950M vs Intel Celeron 2955U

Intel Celeron 2950M

► remove Intel 2950M

The Intel Celeron 2950M is an entry-level dual-core processor clocked at 2.0 GHz and was launched in Fall 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are disabled.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2950M is slightly below the old and somewhat higher clocked Ivy Bridge-based Pentium 2020M. The CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most other applications.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 - 1100 MHz, making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4600 found on a number of other Haswell dual-cores.

The Celeron 2950M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and the VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for medium-sized notebooks 13 - 14 inches or greater.

Intel Celeron 2955U

► remove Intel 2955U

The Intel Celeron 2955U is an entry level, ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor clocked at 1.4 GHz which has been presented in fall 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Compared to the Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7 CPUs, many features like Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, AVX and AES-NI are deactivated.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving performance per clock by almost 10 percent.

The performance of the Celeron 2955U is similar to the old and slightly higher clocked Celeron 1007U, which is based on Ivy Bridge. The CPU has sufficient power for simple office and multimedia purposes.

The integrated HD Graphics (Haswell) offers 10 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 1000 MHz (clocks not confirmed yet), making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). However, the HD Graphics (Haswell) is significantly slower than the HD Graphics 4400 and HD Graphics 5000 of other Haswell ULV models.

The Celeron 2955U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Celeron 2950MIntel Celeron 2955U
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
HaswellHaswell
: Celeron Haswell
Intel Celeron 2970M (compare)2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 2950M2000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2981U (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2980U (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2957U (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2955U1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2961Y (compare)1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2970M (compare)2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2950M2000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2981U (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2980U (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2957U (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 2955U1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 2961Y (compare)1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
2000 MHz1400 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
37 15
960
22 22
130 mm2
100 °C
rPGABGA1168
HD Graphics (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, VirtualizationHD Graphics (200 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (400 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)
$75 U.S.
Intel Celeron 2950MIntel Celeron 2955U

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.6 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
2069 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
4000 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
5117 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
2666 Points (26%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1692.9 seconds (20%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
53.2 seconds (11%)
WinRAR - Result
1054 KB/s (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
7.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
40.7 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
1520 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 Seconds (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
58.9 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1322.1 Seconds (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23260 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
10310 MFLOPS (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
5.5 points (79%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
3854 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
1604 points (8%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
10956 Points (7%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
1002 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1343 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
4412 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
3615 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
2343 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
2104 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
2720 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
2220 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
1277 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
2564 ms (4%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 345     avg: 382.6     median: 347 (4%)     max: 455 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 8758     avg: 10383     median: 10383 (20%)     max: 12008 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 2955U → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)