This is a professional video card for notebooks from NVidia It is based on 7900GTX.
The application performance is very good due to special professional drivers (3D rendering, CAD), but the gaming performance is weaker. With modded drivers, it should work like a 7900 GTX.
The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M → 100%n=4
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 148%n=4
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 05. 00:26:36
#0 checking url part for id 5 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.091s ... 0.092s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.092s
#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.092s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5 +0.024s ... 0.116s
#8 got single benchmarks 5 +0.008s ... 0.124s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0.002s ... 0.125s
#10 got single benchmarks 883 +0.009s ... 0.134s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.161s ... 0.295s
#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.295s
#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.297s