Oppo A5s
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Pricecompare
Average of 6 scores (from 16 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo A5s
Source: Ricks Tech - BwxqLdreZqg
Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2021
Source: India Today Archive.org version
The Oppo A5s has two things going for it - attractive design and great battery life. And while those features do rank high among consumers, the expectations today from a phone, even a budget phone, is far higher. The Oppo A5s struggles in the performance, software and camera departments in a time when the competition is at its fiercest.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Business Standard Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 9,990, the Oppo A5s is a good-looking smartphone with a waterdrop-shaped notch display, decent cameras and a capable battery with good on-battery time of around two days. Except for its performance, the phone’s battery, display, camera and design makes it a good proposition in the budget segment.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2019
Source: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
The OPPO A5s isn’t hard to recommend at this price point. Aside from long battery life, camera quality is surprisingly decent. We also liked the use of Helio P35, providing a slight boost in gaming and high-quality content streaming compared to the P22.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% performance: 85% display: 75% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Good Gear Guide Archive.org version
I wouldn’t say I was impressed with the AX5s. After all, this is still a budget device and comes with a lot of the usual compromises. All the same, I was impressed with the value that Oppo have managed to squeeze out of that cheaper price-point. $70 might not sound like a huge discount on the original AX5 - but it’s still almost 20% of the original price. Sure, the AX5s has cut a few corners., it does share many of the same weaknesses with its predecessor. But when you factor in the exceptional battery life, improved processor and updated design, it’s hard not to dig what Oppo are selling here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Overall, he OPPO A5s delivers a sizeable screen, pretty great battery life, expandable storage, and a decent enough performance. A couple of downsides though are that the display is only HD+, it’s still running Android 8.1 Oreo, and that the photo quality could be a bit better. For a price of PHP 6,990, it’s good enough to get if you don’t mind the drawbacks. We do feel that there are other entry-level smartphones out there in the same price range which offer more than what OPPO A5s does.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Tech2 Archive.org version
If my colleague’s Redmi Y3 review (also priced at Rs 9,999) is anything to go by, then the A5s falls short by quite a margin which makes it hard to recommend. The Redmi Note 7 also offers a better chipset (Snapdragon 660) and a beautiful design at Rs 9,999. Oppo really needs to pull up its socks given how cutthroat the budget smartphone segment has become these days.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: nDevil DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great display; nice cameras; good price; decent processor; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; frameless display; nice design; great built quality; good dual cameras; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/16/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; fast fingerprint sensor; nice dual cameras; long battery life. Negative: Thick frames; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; great built quality; fast fingerprint sensor; nice dual cameras; long battery life. Negative: Thick frames; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/08/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; big screen; nice cameras; decent hardware; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/18/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; stylish design; decent hardware; large battery capacity; nice cameras; support face ID.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2019
Comment
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P35 MT6765: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2.3 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.7 LTE modem (300 Mbps download).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.20":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.74%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.