Face Off: HP EliteBook 820 G2 vs. Lenovo ThinkPad X250 vs. Dell Latitude 12 E7250
Compared to Ultrabooks, business notebooks offer more options with a more professional look. At the same time, they also tend to be thicker, heavier, and sturdier to accommodate the extra hardware and to give a better sense of endurance. Smaller business notebooks are an excellent solution for those who find 15-inch models too daunting while still keeping most of the business-centric qualities and features.
For this Face Off, we'll compare the three top 12.5-inch business models from the three largest providers of business solutions. The EliteBook 820 G2, ThinkPad X250, and Latitude 12 E7250 are all relatively new, so these are currently some of the best subnotebooks that the big manufacturers have to offer as of 2015.
We encourage users to check out our dedicated review pages below for more data and detailed analyses of each of the three models. This comparison is by no means a replacement, but a condensed aid for those on the fence.
Case
In most cases, the build quality between a typical Ultrabook and a dedicated business notebook is like night and day. The three models here all meet MIL-SPEC standards and are all made of magnesium alloy. In the case of the ThinkPad X250 and Latitude E7250, these two are further reinforced with glass-fiber plastic and aluminum, respectively. Rigidity and stability are both excellent for all models, so any complaints in this section will simply be nitpicking between them.
First place in this category goes to the EliteBook 820 G2, which remains unchanged from the 820 G1 series. The notebook shows outstanding resistance to twists and depressions, even on normally weaker spots such as the outer lid and center of the keyboard. The large metal hinges keep wobbling to a minimum. The Dell is a very close second as its signature Tri-Metal case is almost as impressive; The palm rests and display will slightly warp with some force. Note that all models can be equipped with touchscreen options, though the HP and Dell also include Gorilla Glass 3.
The ThinkPad X250 comes in last place for its all-around weaker chassis. It's still quite sturdy, but the lid is not as stiff and the base can still be twisted. However, the Lenovo is lighter than both the HP and Dell by at least 100 grams and is ever so slightly smaller as well.
Winner: HP EliteBook 820 G2
Connectivity
A good business notebook should be adaptable with plenty of options and ports, and all three do not disappoint in this regard. SIM slots are optional on all models with RJ-45 and proprietary docking ports for even more options. Instead, the key differentiating factors are the choice of video-out ports and internal storage options. The Dell includes no VGA-out, which is still a widely used legacy port in classrooms and conference rooms, so a dongle may be necessary.
The EliteBook comes out slightly ahead again as it is the only model with 3x storage solutions to support M.2, mSATA, and 2.5-inch SATA drives all in one chassis. It also has VGA-out and an additional USB 3.0 port compared to the Dell and Lenovo, respectively.
Winner: HP EliteBook 820 G2
HP EliteBook 820 G2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X250 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
USB | 3x USB 3.0 | 2x USB 3.0 | 3x USB 3.0 |
Video-out | DisplayPort, VGA-out | Mini-DisplayPort, VGA-out | Mini-DisplayPort, HDMI-out |
Other | SD reader, SmartCard reader, 3.5 mm headset, SIM slot, Gigabit LAN, Docking port, NFC, Kensington Lock | SD reader, SmartCard reader, 3.5 mm combo headset, SIM slot, Gigabit LAN, Docking port, Kensington Lock | SD reader, SmartCard reader, 3.5 mm combo headset, SIM slot, Gigabit LAN, Docking port, NFC, Kensington Lock |
Storage Bays | 1x M.2, 1x mSATA, 1x 2.5-inch SATA III | 1x 2.5-inch SATA III, 1x M.2 | 2x mSATA |
Display
Display options vary for each notebook, but all three can be equipped with up to 1080p IPS displays. In the case of our test models, the panels are all produced by LG Philips and offer relatively similar colors and contrast. Even color coverage is similar between the three panels at about 42 percent of the AdobeRGB standard.
The main difference here is backlight brightness and the display on the ThinkPad X250 can be brighter than both the HP and Dell. This makes a tangible difference when using the notebook outdoors compared to any slight advantages that the other notebooks may have in color accuracy or reproduction.
Winner: Lenovo ThinkPad X250
HP EliteBook 820 G2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X250 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
Size | 12.5-inch IPS 16:9 | 12.5-inch IPS 16:9 | 12.5-inch IPS 16:9 |
Native Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Pixel Density | 176 PPI | 176 PPI | 176 PPI |
Panel ID | LG Philips (unavailable ID) | LG LP125WF2-SPB2 | LG LGD0436 195C3 125W1 |
Panel | Matte or Glossy | Matte | Matte or Glossy |
Touchscreen | Optional | Optional | Optional |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
---|---|---|---|
Display | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 43.72 | 44.14 | 44.48 |
sRGB Coverage | 65.3 | 65.8 | 66.2 |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.24 | 45.71 | 45.96 |
Screen | |||
Brightness middle | 300 | 397 | 360 |
Brightness | 298 | 357 | 330 |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 81 | 81 |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.53 |
Contrast | 909 | 902 | 679 |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.68 | 4.2 | 5.58 |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 3.1 | 3.98 |
Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.6 85% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6310 103% | 6246 104% | 6192 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41.6 | 42 | 42.2 |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64.9 | 65.5 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) |
* ... smaller is better
Input Devices
The HP keyboard loses this round as we find its feedback to be a bit softer than both the Dell and Lenovo. Meanwhile, we described the AccuType keyboard on the Lenovo as "pretty close to a perfect input device" as far as 12.5-inch notebooks go, and is a bit wider than the keyboard on the Dell as well. Nonetheless, the experience is rather cramped no matter the choice as this is an inherent drawback.
As for the touchpad experience, HP's EliteBook 820 offers the smallest surface area (8.5 x 4.6 cm) as it includes four dedicated mouse keys that take up valuable space. The touchpad on the E7250 is perhaps the most ergonomic with its long diagonal of 11.5 cm and is more rectangular than the touchpad on the X250, though the notebook lacks a trackpoint. Meanwhile, the X250 is the only model with both integrated and dedicated mouse keys.
Despite the many physical differences between the multi-touch touchpads, we found them all to be reliable and firm. It certainly comes down to user habits and preferences regarding trackpoints and mouse keys.
Winner: Keyboard -- Lenovo ThinkPad X250
Touchpad -- Tie
Performance
CPU Performance
The three manufacturers offer plenty of CPU options for their respective notebooks. For this section, we'll compare the hardware configurations that were shipped to us for review.
The ULV Broadwell cores in our HP, Dell, and Lenovo are very similar and perform almost identically according to synthetic benchmarks. The i7-5600U in our Lenovo edges out both the EliteBook and Latitude by about 5 to 10 percent, respectively, in single-core and multi-core CineBench tests. This is largely due to the higher clock rates of the i7-5600U as there are no other significant differences between them.
As a side note, the X250 is limited to one SODIMM slot and is thus single-channel only compared to its dual-channel competitors. For day-to-day use, performance differences are not tangible, though RAM expansion will be more limited.
More comparisons and technical information on the Core i7-5500U, i7-5600U, and i5-5300U can be found on our dedicated CPU pages.
HP EliteBook 820 G2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X250 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
CPU | 2.4 GHz Core i7-5500U | 2.6 GHz Core i7-5600U | 2.3 GHz Core i5-5300U |
TDP | 15 W | 15 W | 15 W |
RAM | 8 GB DDR3L-1600, 2x SODIMM | 8 GB DDR3L-1600, 1x SODIMM | 8 GB DDR3L-1600, 2x SODIMM |
GPU | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 |
wPrime 2.10 | |
1024m (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
32m (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Physics (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
PCMark 8 | |
Storage Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
Pass 1 (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
Pass 2 (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
* ... smaller is better
GPU Performance
The same integrated HD 5500 GPU powers all three models. Thus, the GPU performance gap between them is even narrower than any CPU differences. Lenovo consistently comes out ahead in synthetic graphics benchmarks by up to 5 percent. Of course, the hair-thin advantage is likely meaningless to the target audience and will barely make a difference when gaming.
More comparisons and technical information on the HD 5500 can be found on our dedicated GPU page.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
Cinebench R15 - OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value) | |
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
Stress Test
To test system stability, we run both Prime95 and FurMark to simulate maximum stress. These unrealistic conditions do not represent daily workloads, but are instead meant to put both the CPU and GPU at 100 percent capacity. If the notebook remains stable, then you can be sure it can handle any other tasks without a major hardware failure.
As expected, the three notebooks throttle their respective CPUs due to either TDP limitations or hardware-imposed temperature control. Notably, the notebooks throttle to around the same 1.4 to 1.6 GHz range despite their differences in base clock rates.
HP's EliteBook 820 G2 comes out the clear winner with a low CPU temperature of just 66 C after a full hour of stress compared to ~80 C on the Dell and Lenovo. This is representative of a superior cooling system when all else are relatively equal.
Winner: HP EliteBook 820 G2
HP EliteBook 820 G2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X250 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
Rated GPU Core Clock (MHz) | 300 - 950 | 300 - 950 | 300 - 950 |
Stable GPU Core Clock on FurMark (MHz) | 750 - 800 | 750 - 800 | 750 - 800 |
Rated CPU Core Clock (GHz) | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.3 |
Stable CPU Core Clock on Prime95 (GHz) | 1.4 - 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Maximum CPU temperature | 66 C | 79 C | 84 C |
Emissions
System Noise & Temperature
The three notebooks remain silent at around 30 dB(A) when idling or under very low loads. When under very high loads, the HP and Lenovo are still surprisingly quiet at 34 to 35 dB(A) maximum. This is compared to 43 dB(A) on the Dell, which is a common maximum fan noise range for many Ultrabooks. The X250 has a handy fan control mode to allow for higher speeds, but we noticed no major performance advantages when enabled.
Both the Dell and HP show higher surface temperatures when under stress compared to the Lenovo. This may be because of the longer heat pipes in the two systems that distribute more heat to more areas of the notebook when taking our surface temperature measurements. Even so, the E7250 can get quite warm at over 55 C on the bottom rear of the notebook.
The slight edge goes to Lenovo for its lower surface temperature and fan noise compared to the EliteBook and Latitude.
Winner: Lenovo ThinkPad X250
HP EliteBook 820 G2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X250 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 | |
Fan Noise when idling | 29 dB(A) | 29 dB(A) | 30 dB(A) |
Fan Noise under high loads | 35 dB(A) | 34 dB(A) | 43 dB(A) |
Average surface temperature when idling | 30.4 C | 25.8 C | 28.6 C |
Average surface temperature under high loads | 37.4 C | 30.8 C | 36.6 C |
Battery Life
The manufacturers have opted for integrated Li-Ion polymer solutions for their respective models, so they can only be accessed after removing the maintenance panels. The E7250 can be configured with a lower capacity 39 Wh battery to reduce weight.
Lenovo has taken an interesting approach by equipping the X250 with both integrated and removable batteries. The small internal 24 Wh battery comes standard, but users can attach a secondary battery on the rear of the notebook up to 24 Wh, 48 Wh, or 72 Wh capacities for a combined total of up to 96 Wh. Runtimes will increase at the cost of a heavier notebook. Our particular unit is equipped with a 24 Wh secondary for a total of 48 Wh.
Runtimes are generally similar between the three models with the HP slightly ahead in most cases. Our WiFi v1.3 test is more demanding than our older WiFi test, so we cannot compare WiFi runtimes directly against the Dell. Nonetheless, we prefer the modular and more adaptable approach of the X250 for its battery hot swapping.
Winner: Lenovo ThinkPad X250
HP Elitebook 820 G2-J8R58EA 46 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X250-20CLS06D00 48 (24 plus 24) Wh | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 52 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||
Reader / Idle | 921 | 779 | 845 |
WiFi v1.3 | 338 | 298 | |
Load | 97 | 92 | 103 |
WiFi | 325 | 446 |
Verdict
Once again, crowning a definitive winner is another tough call. Frequent outdoor users may prefer the Lenovo ThinkPad X250 for its lighter weight, brighter display, wider 180-degree hinges, and modular battery support. Case quality takes a small hit compared to the HP and Dell, but the benefits are varied nonetheless.
For a more standard office and conference solution, we prefer the EliteBook 820 G2 over the Dell and Lenovo. It's built tougher with just a few more connectivity options and runs quieter than the E7250. Surface temperatures are warmer than both models, but this should be less of an issue in an office setting. The triple storage bays will mean less reliance on external drives as well. No matter the choice, all three are long-lasting notebooks able to take a fair amount of punishment from daily use.
HP EliteBook 820 G2 as configured: $1399
Lenovo ThinkPad X250 as configured: $1549
Dell Latitude 12 E7250 as configured: $1779
See more quick comparisons in our Face Off series:
Dell XPS 15 vs. Apple MacBook Pro 15 vs. Asus ZenBook Pro UX501
HP EliteBook 820 G2 | Lenovo ThinkPad X250 | Dell Latitude 12 E7250 |
---|---|---|
+ 1080p glossy or matte IPS screen + Very strong Magnesium chassis + Low fan noise + 2x SODIMM slots + Full-size DisplayPort and VGA + 3x storage bays + Optional NFC | + 1080p matte IPS screen + Magnesium and glass-fiber reinforced plastic chassis + Brightest display backlight + 180-degree hinges + Low fan noise and surface temperatures + Mini DisplayPort and VGA + Smallest and lightest of the three + Both integrated and modular batteries | + 1080p glossy or matte IPS screen + Very strong "Tri-Metal" chassis + 2x SODIMM slot + Optional NFC + HDMI and Mini DisplayPort + 180-degree hinges |
- Least brightest display - Small touchpad - Slightly softer keyboard feedback | - Weakest chassis of the three - 1x SODIMM only - No glossy or glass display options - Only 2x USB 3.0 ports - No NFC option | - Highest fan noise under load - No internal support for 2.5-inch drives - Heaviest of the three - Very warm CPU under high loads - No trackpoint |