Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M is an entry level graphics card for mobile workstations (laptops). It is based on the same core as the Quadro NVS 160M and the GeForce 9200M / 9300M GS. The drivers are optimized for OpenGL applications and professional 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization applications. Furthermore, the drivers are certified to work with the most popular apps without problems.

The gaming performance is a bit below the similar 9200M / 9300M chip because of the professional drivers and therefore the GPU is only capable of displaying low end games fluently. Modern intensive 3D games wont run fluently or only with very low detail settings.

As the 9300M series, the Quadro FX 370M supports PureVideo HD to decode (HD) videos in the GPU.

The performance of the chip also depends on the used graphics memory. Either fast GDDR3 memory (clocked at 700 MHz) or slow GDDR2 (with 400MHz) can be used by the laptop manufacturer.

In the Dell Precision M2400, only GDDR2 graphics memory is used, leading to a slow performance (e.g. Doom3 - ultra 40fps). According to Dell the graphics card needs 20 Watt.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the old entry level NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300. Due to certified drivers, the FX 350M is suited for CAD and DCC applications. Still the 3D performance is not very good (even at the time of launch), therefore the card is better suited for 2D CAD applications.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370MNVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9M-GLMG72M
Pipelines8 - unified4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed580 MHz450 MHz
Shader Speed1450 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz350 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3DDR-3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB64 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption20 Watt15 Watt
technology65 nm90 nm
Date of Announcement15.08.2008 31.03.2006
InformationOpenGL 2.1, max. 1920x1200 (digital) bzw 2048x1536 (analog), max. 2 unabhängige Displays, PCI-Express x16, optionale Interfaces (des Chips): DP, VGA, DVI, LVDS, HDMI90nm, 112 Mio Transistoren, PCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de
Transistors112 Million
FeaturesPureVideo, UltraShadow II, Intellisample 4.0, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, High Dynamic-Range (HDR) Lighning

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
3DMark 06
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
3DMark 06
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 370M:
97  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 370M:
97.1  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 370M:
65.4  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 370M:
39.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom 39797.165.439.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1


1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.005s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_1 entry uid:586099 from 2024.06.03 10:15 +0s ... 0.005s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 13622> for benchmark 1, setting:13 +0s ... 0.141s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5532> for benchmark 2, setting:14 +0s ... 0.142s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3963> for benchmark 2, setting:14 +0s ... 0.144s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3290> for benchmark 3, setting:15 +0s ... 0.145s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1954> for benchmark 3, setting:15 +0s ... 0.147s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1595> for benchmark 4, setting:16 +0s ... 0.148s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 680> for benchmark 4, setting:2288 +0s ... 0.15s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12.32> for benchmark 38, setting:166 +0s ... 0.151s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16.79> for benchmark 38, setting:167 +0s ... 0.153s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11.96> for benchmark 38, setting:168 +0s ... 0.154s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 27.29> for benchmark 38, setting:169 +0s ... 0.155s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 13.67> for benchmark 38, setting:170 +0s ... 0.157s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 21.75> for benchmark 38, setting:171 +0s ... 0.158s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6.78> for benchmark 38, setting:172 +0s ... 0.16s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.09> for benchmark 38, setting:173 +0s ... 0.161s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3031> for benchmark 22, setting:38 +0s ... 0.162s

log 03. 11:09:17

#0 checking url part for id 1054 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 70 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1717405757s = 19877.381446759d, id:gpuID:1054 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_gpu already found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.005s

#6 composed specs +0.096s ... 0.101s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.101s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.101s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1054 +0.024s ... 0.125s

#10 got single benchmarks 1054 +0.007s ... 0.132s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 70 +0.001s ... 0.133s

#12 got single benchmarks 70 +0.006s ... 0.139s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.139s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.141s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.142s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.144s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.145s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.147s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.148s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.15s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.151s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.153s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.154s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.155s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.157s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.158s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.16s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.161s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.162s

#30 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.162s

#31 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.162s

#32 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.164s

#33 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.164s

#34 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.165s

#35 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.167s

#36 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.167s

#37 return log +0.045s ... 0.212s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)