Intel Atom Z3736F vs Intel Atom Z3735D

Intel Atom Z3736F

► remove Intel Z3736F

The Intel Atom Z3736F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (Android or Windows). It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735F, the Z3736F offers a somewhat higher CPU burst.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3736F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3736F competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex Windows software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3736F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and can also be found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3735D

► remove Intel Z3735D

The Intel Atom Z3735D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745D, the Z3735D offers a somewhat lower GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735D is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3735D
Intel AtomIntel Atom
Bay Trail-TBay Trail-T
: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 (compare)1590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 (compare)1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 (compare)1460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D (compare)1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 (compare)1460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D (compare)1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G (compare)1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 (compare)1330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 (compare)1330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 (compare)1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D (compare)1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3795 (compare)1590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 (compare)1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 (compare)1460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D (compare)1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 (compare)1460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D (compare)1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G (compare)1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 (compare)1330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 (compare)1330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G (compare)1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 (compare)1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D (compare)1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
1330 - 2160 MHz1330 - 1830 MHz
224 KB224 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
<4 <4
22 22
UTFCBGA592UTFCBGA1380
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)
$20 U.S.
Intel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3735D

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 713     avg: 930     median: 962 (10%)     max: 1115 Points
min: 744     avg: 851     median: 851 (9%)     max: 958 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 2309     avg: 2700     median: 2867 (4%)     max: 2924 Points
min: 2514     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (4%)     max: 2938 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 1190     avg: 1191.6     median: 1191 (14%)     max: 1192 seconds
1164.7 seconds (14%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 37     avg: 38     median: 38 (8%)     max: 38 seconds
37.2 seconds (7%)
WinRAR - Result
1624 KB/s (19%)
1669 KB/s (20%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
6.8 fps (0%)
6.8 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
35.6 fps (13%)
35.1 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.6 GB/s (3%)
0.6 GB/s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 47     avg: 47.6     median: 47 (10%)     max: 48 Seconds
92 Seconds (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 103     avg: 103.9     median: 103 (4%)     max: 104 Seconds
176.3 Seconds (8%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2088     avg: 2141.8     median: 2141 (10%)     max: 2195 Seconds
3458.4 Seconds (15%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 950     avg: 1085     median: 1144 (6%)     max: 1161 points
min: 1199     avg: 1202     median: 1202 (6%)     max: 1205 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 11513     avg: 12263.5     median: 12263 (8%)     max: 13014 Points
min: 13200     avg: 13403     median: 13403 (9%)     max: 13606 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 886     avg: 967     median: 967 (2%)     max: 1048 Points
min: 1041     avg: 1055     median: 1055 (3%)     max: 1069 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
2148 Points (17%)
2303 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
1881 Points (17%)
2014 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
2033 Points (3%)
2247 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
2446 Points (4%)
2620 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
2158 Points (5%)
2336 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1941     avg: 2051     median: 2051 (3%)     max: 2161 Points
min: 2138     avg: 2167.5     median: 2167 (3%)     max: 2197 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 729     avg: 787     median: 787 (16%)     max: 845 Points
min: 782     avg: 782.5     median: 782 (16%)     max: 783 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 5502     avg: 7119.1     median: 5862 (10%)     max: 9992 ms
min: 8844     avg: 9010.7     median: 9010 (15%)     max: 9177 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 503     avg: 529.2     median: 508 (6%)     max: 575 ms
min: 489     avg: 490.4     median: 490 (5%)     max: 491 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 2958     avg: 5322.3     median: 6002 (11%)     max: 7007 Points
min: 3479     avg: 3509     median: 3509 (7%)     max: 3539 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3736F → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735D → 99%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)