Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3736F vs Intel Atom Z3735D vs Intel Atom Z3775

Intel Atom Z3736F

► remove from comparison Intel Z3736F

The Intel Atom Z3736F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (Android or Windows). It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735F, the Z3736F offers a somewhat higher CPU burst.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3736F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3736F competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex Windows software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3736F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and can also be found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3735D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3735D

The Intel Atom Z3735D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745D, the Z3735D offers a somewhat lower GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735D is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3775

► remove from comparison Intel Z3775

The Intel Atom Z3775 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.46 - 2.39 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Compared to the Z3770, the Z3775 is based on the new C0 stepping and offers a slightly increased GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.46 - 2.39 GHz, the Z3775 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. The Z3775 even beats some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3735DIntel Atom Z3775
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1330 - 2160 MHz1330 - 1830 MHz1460 - 2390 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP<4 Watt<4 Watt<4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA592UTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$20 U.S.$35 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3735DIntel Atom Z3775

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3775 +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3775 +
0.4 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 713     avg: 930     median: 962 (9%)     max: 1115 Points
min: 744     avg: 851     median: 851 (8%)     max: 958 Points
min: 1108     avg: 1139     median: 1144 (10%)     max: 1165 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2309     avg: 2700     median: 2867 (4%)     max: 2924 Points
min: 2514     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (4%)     max: 2938 Points
min: 3997     avg: 4025     median: 4014 (5%)     max: 4065 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1190     avg: 1192     median: 1191.5 (14%)     max: 1193 s
1165 s (14%)
min: 762     avg: 800     median: 800 (9%)     max: 838 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37.86     avg: 38     median: 38 (8%)     max: 38.17 s
37.2 s (7%)
min: 24.2     avg: 25.5     median: 25.5 (5%)     max: 26.74 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z3736F +
1624 Points (9%)
103%
1 Z3735D +
1669 Points (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.8 fps (3%)
6.8 fps (3%)
9.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
35.6 fps (10%)
35.1 fps (10%)
47 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.6 GB/s (2%)
0.6 GB/s (2%)
0.9 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z3775 +
2195 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 47.15     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
92 s (20%)
min: 36     avg: 36.3     median: 36.3 (8%)     max: 36.52 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 103.8     avg: 103.9     median: 103.9 (4%)     max: 104 s
176.3 s (8%)
min: 80     avg: 80.1     median: 80.1 (3%)     max: 80.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2088     avg: 2142     median: 2142 (10%)     max: 2196 s
3458 s (15%)
min: 1719     avg: 1723     median: 1723 (8%)     max: 1727 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 Z3775 +
4793 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z3736F +
min: 950     avg: 1085     median: 1144 (4%)     max: 1161 Points
105%
1 Z3735D +
min: 1199     avg: 1202     median: 1202 (4%)     max: 1205 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 11513     avg: 12264     median: 12263.5 (8%)     max: 13014 Points
min: 13200     avg: 13403     median: 13403 (9%)     max: 13606 Points
17178 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z3736F +
min: 886     avg: 967     median: 967 (2%)     max: 1048 Points
109%
1 Z3735D +
min: 1041     avg: 1055     median: 1055 (3%)     max: 1069 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1941     avg: 2051     median: 2051 (4%)     max: 2161 Points
min: 2138     avg: 2168     median: 2167.5 (4%)     max: 2197 Points
2925 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 729     avg: 787     median: 787 (15%)     max: 845 Points
min: 782     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (15%)     max: 783 Points
907 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3736F +
2148 Points (17%)
107%
1 Z3735D +
2303 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3736F +
1881 Points (17%)
107%
1 Z3735D +
2014 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3736F +
2033 Points (4%)
111%
1 Z3735D +
2247 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3736F +
2446 Points (5%)
107%
1 Z3735D +
2620 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3736F +
2158 Points (6%)
108%
1 Z3735D +
2336 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5502     avg: 7119     median: 5863 (7%)     max: 9992 ms
min: 8844     avg: 9011     median: 9010.5 (11%)     max: 9177 ms
7111 ms (8%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 504     avg: 529     median: 508 (6%)     max: 576 ms
min: 489.3     avg: 490.4     median: 490.4 (5%)     max: 491.4 ms
350.6 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z3736F +
min: 2958     avg: 5322     median: 6002 (6%)     max: 7007 Points
58%
1 Z3735D +
min: 3479     avg: 3509     median: 3509 (4%)     max: 3539 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3736F → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735D → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3775 → 124% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 10. 20:12:38

#0 checking url part for id 6210 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5964 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5937 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.014s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.019s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.019s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 6210 +0s ... 0.019s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#48 got single benchmarks 6210 +0.009s ... 0.029s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 5964 +0s ... 0.029s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#51 got single benchmarks 5964 +0.007s ... 0.037s

#52 getting avg benchmarks for device 5937 +0.001s ... 0.037s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#54 got single benchmarks 5937 +0.009s ... 0.047s

#55 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#163 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.074s

#164 return log +0s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)