Wiko Ridge 4G
Specifications

Pricecompare
Average of 5 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko Ridge 4G
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/04/2015
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 82% features: 100% display: 86% mobility: 55% ergonomy: 94%
Source: Tom's Hardware

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2015
Source: Connect - Heft 05/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobicroco

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/10/2015
Rating: Total score: 91% features: 92% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 92%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 1/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 60%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 306: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 410 SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
410 MSM8916: 64-Bit Cortex-A53 Quad-Core with an Adreno 306 GPU manufactured in 28nm» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00":
This is a typical smartphone diagonal.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.0.125 kg:
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Wiko:
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
81.8%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.