UMI Plus E
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5.0MP GalaxyCore® GC5005 camera
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 15 reviews)
Reviews for the UMI Plus E
Source: IT Pro Portal
Archive.org versionPremium experience with an affordable price tag. This is a close as you will get to a super phone without breaking the bank.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Beta News
Archive.org versionOne would have to be seriously biased against the UMi Plus E in order not to appreciate the sheer competitiveness of the smartphone. It is keenly priced, has an exquisite design and doesn’t look cheap compared to more premium smartphones like the Google Pixel.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: IT Pro Portal
Archive.org versionPremium experience with an affordable price tag. This is a close as you will get to a super phone without breaking the bank.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Foreign Reviews
Source: CNet Deutschland
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: ChinaMobileMag
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; good hardware; long battery life; fast charge.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/11/2016
Source: 4G News
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 75% performance: 75% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 63% features: 70% display: 65% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 70% display: 75% mobility: 65% workmanship: 79%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Androidiani
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; decent hardware; long battery life. Negative: Poor cameras; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/03/2017
Source: Cinafoniaci
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice design; good display; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor selfie camera; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/26/2016
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive design; flexible fingerprint scanner; excellent display. Negative: Poor cameras; average speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/14/2017
Source: Arena IT
→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Great built quality; good hardware; high autonomy. Negative: Poor cameras; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2017
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.