Coolpad Mega 5A
Specifications

Coolpad Mega 5A (Mega Series)
Processor
unknown
Graphics adapter
unknown
Memory
2048 MB
Display
5.45 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB
Connections
Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (SIM 2 slot), Sensors: Accelerometer, microUSB
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 148 x 70.7 ( = 0.35 x 5.83 x 2.78 in)
Battery
2500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: Virtual
Weight
148 g ( = 5.22 oz / 0.33 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
100 Euro
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
price: 50%, performance: 50%, features: - %, display: 60% mobility: 60%, workmanship: 60%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Coolpad Mega 5A
Source: India Today

Design is okay, screen more than okay and camera performance of the Mega 5A is something I can forgive and forget. The software too is good, as it is based on Android 8 and battery life is decent. But the performance issues mean the Mega 5A is not a phone that can be recommended.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Coolpad Mega 5A has metal in its construction which is uncommon at this price point. While it has a good feel in the hand, it fails to deliver a good usable experience. The processor is slow, and that coupled with only 2GB of RAM results in longer load times and slower multitasking. We also found its battery life to be slightly on the lower side, and you’ll need to plug it in by the end of the day. If you are on a strict budget, the recently launched Xiaomi Redmi 6A seems to have better hardware on paper, and we will be able to confirm that once we finish reviewing it. If you can extend your budget a little, the Xiaomi Redmi 5 (Review) offers better value for your money.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.