Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

Intel Core 2 Duo U7700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 is an ultra-low-voltage (ULV) processor for laptops that was released in 2006. It is based on the Merom core and offers 64-Bit support and a low TDP of 10 Watt. The U7700 is the fastest model in the U7000 series with a clock rate of 1.33 GHz (U7500 1.1 GHz, U7600 1.2 GHz).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5250

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T5270

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 is a dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Merom core, but does not feature virtualization functions. Despite the low clocke rate, the CPU is specified for relatively high 35 Watt and therefore not suited for small laptops.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo U7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5250Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMerom-2048Merom-2048Merom-2048
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom-2048
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54701.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T54501.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T52701.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52501.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U77001.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U76001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo U75001.06 GHz2 / 2
Clock1330 MHz1500 MHz1400 MHz
FSB533667800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm0.8 - 0.975V65 nm65 nm1.075V-1.250V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo U7700Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
SocketPPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U7700 +
1335 Points (12%)
107%
1 T5270 +
1427 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U7700 +
2515 Points (3%)
108%
1 T5270 +
2717 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5250 +
58.2 s (12%)
98%
1 T5270 +
65.8 s (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U7700 +
1047 Points (2%)
124%
1 T5250 +
1298 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5250 +
36 s (8%)
99%
1 T5270 +
38.5 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
16817 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5270 +
6253 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U7700 +
2460 Points (15%)
118%
1 T5250 +
min: 2702     avg: 3105     median: 2892 (18%)     max: 3720 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo U7700 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5270 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 10. 23:06:00

#0 checking url part for id 385 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 361 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 441 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 385 +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 got single benchmarks 385 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 361 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#28 got single benchmarks 361 +0.014s ... 0.029s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 441 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#31 got single benchmarks 441 +0.005s ... 0.036s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.037s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.042s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#48 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#49 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)