Toshiba Satellite A100-169
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the Toshiba Satellite A100-169
Source: Preissuchmaschine
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/18/2006
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2006
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% features: 80%
Source: Com!
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2006
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% performance: 76% features: 68% ergonomy: 93%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2006
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 83% performance: 87% features: 82% ergonomy: 89%
Source: c't
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/18/2006
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 75% features: 85% display: 55%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/03/2006
Source: Connect
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2006
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 03/30/2006
Rating: performance: 88% features: 72% display: 48% mobility: 64%
Comment
ATI Mobility Radeon X1400: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 is part of the lower middle class. The performance can be compared with an elder X600, but technically it is a X1300, which is scarcely 100 Mhz higher clocked.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2300: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
