Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

The Google Pixel 5 fails to impress in camera tests

Google is no longer good enough to earn a spot in DxOMark's top 10 smartphone leaderboard. (Image source: DxOMark)
Google is no longer good enough to earn a spot in DxOMark's top 10 smartphone leaderboard. (Image source: DxOMark)
The limits of Google's strategy of pairing old camera hardware with excellent software have been shown in a series of camera tests published by DxOMark. There may well be some flaws in DxOMark's methodology, but it seems that Google should now move on from the 12 MP IMX363 camera that it has been using steadfastly for years.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

Given that the Google Pixel line-up has been consistently rated as delivering some of the best smartphone cameras in the last few years, DxOMarks' low score of 120 points for the Pixel 5 may raise a few eyebrows. A score of this magnitude puts the Pixel 5 ahead of last year's Pixel 4, but 120 points puts Google's latest smartphone well behind what Huawei, Xiaomi, Vivo and Oppo have released this year. 

It should be noted that DxOMark recently updated its evaluation criteria, but its test results demonstrate the limits of Google's continual use of the 12 MP Sony IMX363. Google has equipped its Pixel smartphones with the IMX363 for years, and it simply is not good enough to replace the dedicated telephoto lens that was present in the Pixel 4 series. Consequently, the Pixel 5 comparatively struggles in zoom shots.

The new ultra-wide-angle camera does not impress either. According to DxoMark, this is mainly because its 107° field of view (FoV) is much narrower than the FoVs of the ultra-wide-angle cameras in competing smartphones. With that said, the Pixel 5 has noticeably better video performance than the Pixel 4 series, an improvement that has been praised widely.

DxOMark's views on the low-light capabilities of the Pixel 5 are a bit off though, in our opinion. By the websites own admission, it tested the Pixel 'using the default mode of the...default camera application'. For the Pixel 5, this means that DxOMark calculated its 'Night score' using both flash modes, not Night Sight mode. The website claims that most people will use flash rather than Night Sight, although this seems to be an assertion more than anything else. Google actively promotes using Night Sight too, so perhaps DxOMark has shown the limits of its testing methodologies too, not just the boundaries of the IMX363.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
(Image source: DxOMark)
(Image source: DxOMark)

Source(s)

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Alex Alderson
Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 4146 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
Prior to writing and translating for Notebookcheck, I worked for various companies including Apple and Neowin. I have a BA in International History and Politics from the University of Leeds, which I have since converted to a Law Degree. Happy to chat on Twitter or Notebookchat.
contact me via: @aldersonaj
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2020 11 > The Google Pixel 5 fails to impress in camera tests
Alex Alderson, 2020-11- 2 (Update: 2020-11- 2)