Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

► remove from comparison Intel T9800

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 was the top dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. Later it was topped by the Core 2 Duo T9900 / X9100. Still the T9800 is a high end laptop CPU which is well suited for single and dual threaded applications.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9800 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. On average, only faster dual cores (like the T9900 or fast Core i7) or Core i7 quad cores can be faster than the T9800.

The T9800 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9800 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.26 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is an OEM CPU and similar to the Core 2 Duo P8400 (additional Trusted Execution Technology, and VT-x) and Core 2 Duo P7570.

The performance of the P7550 is on par with the fast Turion II Ultra with about 2.4 to 2.6 GHz. Modern demanding games like Supreme Commander may be limited by the CPU performance. High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Core 2 Duo (or Core i5 / i7).

The P7550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9800Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2920 MHz2260 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1-1.25 V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBit
Architecturex86x86
$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9800Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3633 Points (32%)
2439 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6839 Points (9%)
4645 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P7550 +
35.6 s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2626 Points (6%)
2004 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
15 s (3%)
22.7 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
38 s (2%)
53.6 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1008 s (4%)
1278 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
26991 MIPS (13%)
17680 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
20305 MFLOPS (16%)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
6618 Points (42%)
4946 Points (31%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9800 +
5.7 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9800 +
5802 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 81% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 02:08:20

#0 checking url part for id 448 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.013s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 448 +0s ... 0.014s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#47 got single benchmarks 448 +0.009s ... 0.023s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.023s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#50 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.037s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#72 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.037s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#74 return log +0.004s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)