Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs AMD A4-5050

Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron SU2300 is a CULV processor for small and light laptops. It is the slowest dual core CPU based on the Penryn core and offers not all power saving features of the architecture. Furthermore, the Trusted Execution Technology feature are not available.

Due to the low clock rate, the performance of the SU 2300 Celeron is limited, but still noticeable better than Atom netbooks.

 

AMD A4-5050

► remove from comparison AMD A4-5050

The AMD A4-5050 is a mobile quad-core SoC for low-end laptops, which was presented in Q1/2014. In addition to 4 CPU cores with a clock speed of 1.55 GHz (no Turbo), the 28-nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon HD 8330 GPU, a single channel DDR3(L)-1600 memory controller as well as the Southbridge with various I/O- ports. The only difference to the A4-5100 is the slightly lower TDP (13.5 W instead of 15 W). Probably, the A4-5050 is an OEM-only model, which is sold exclusively from HP.

Architecture

Both Kabini (for notebooks) and Temash (tablets and compact subnotebooks) are based on AMD's new Jaguar architecture, which replaces the previous Bobcat models (e.g. the E-350). The performance per clock has been increased by about 20 percent. Furthermore, various modern instruction set extensions such as SSE up to version 4.2, AVX and AES are now supported. The finer 28-nanometer process from TSMC allows lower voltages and/or higher clock rates compared to Bobcat, as well as up to 4 CPU cores (Bobcat: 2 cores).

Performance

Due to the low clock speed of 1.55 GHz, the performance in poorly parallelized applications is quite modest and just slightly above the old E2-1800. However, if all 4 cores are busy, the performance equals the Sandy-Bridge-based Core i3-2377M. For office and multimedia tasks, the A4-5050 has sufficient power; however, it will reach its limits in more demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The SoC integrates a Radeon HD 8330 GPU with 128 shaders, which is based on the GCN architecture and clocked at 500 MHz (no Turbo, clock not confirmed yet). On average, the HD 8330 matches a Radeon HD 7470M or Intel HD Graphics 4000. Many recent games (as of 2013/2014) are therefore hardly playable. However, some older or less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 13.5 watts. Thus, the A4-5050 is a bit more economical than the A4-5000/5100 and suitable for even smaller notebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300AMD A4-5050
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD A-Series
CodenamePenrynKabini
Series: A-Series Kabini
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100 compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5200 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-5100 compare1.55 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-5050 « 1.55 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-5000 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD E2-3800 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1200 MHz1550 MHz
FSB800
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP10 Watt13.5 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm28 nm
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA956
FeaturesVt, Speedstep, Thermal Monitor 2SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600
Architecturex86x86
$134 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8330 (? - 500 MHz)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SU2300 +
1250 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SU2300 +
2380 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU2300 +
2367 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU2300 +
1256 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SU2300 +
1000 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SU2300 +
44 s (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SU2300 +
103 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SU2300 +
10240 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SU2300 +
8800 MFLOPS (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 31. 05:51:33

#0 checking url part for id 496 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5299 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:40:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 496 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 496 +0.019s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5299 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 5299 +0s ... 0.056s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.091s

#12 return log +0.067s ... 0.158s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)