Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3188 vs Marvell Armada PXA1908 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910T

Rockchip RK3188

► remove from comparison

The Rockchip RK3188 is a fast ARM SoC primarily designed for tablets. It integrates four ARM Cortex A9 cores with NEON extension and a clock speed of up to 1.8 GHz, a Mali-400 MP4 graphics card (up to 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) and a low-power (LP-)DDR2/DDR3 memory controller. Due to the high clock rates, the performance of the CPU and GPU is superior to other Cortex-A9 quad-cores such as the Nvidia Tegra 3 and Samsung Exynos 4412. These high frequencies are possible due to the 28nm process (TSMC). However, this results in high power consumption and is thus not suited for compact smartphones.

Marvell Armada PXA1908

► remove from comparison

The Marvell Armada PXA1908 is an ARM based low end SoC for smartphones and tablets. The chip was announced in late 2014 and integrates four 64-Bit Cortex-A53 processor cores with up to 1.2 GHz. As a graphics card, the SoC integrates a Vivante GC7000UL. Furthermore, a LPDDR2/3 memory controller and a HSPA+/WCDMA/LTE Cat. 4 (max. 150 Mbit/s) radio is integrated. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and also suited for small smartphones. 

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 910T is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.8 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910 is a 200 MHz slower clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance of the Kirin910T is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

ModelRockchip RK3188Marvell Armada PXA1908HiSilicon Kirin 910T
Series Marvell Technology Group
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A53Cortex-A9
Series: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 910T « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1800 MHz1200 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
FeaturesMali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)Vivante GC7000UL GPU, HSPA+/WCDMA/LTE Cat. 4, LPDDR2/3 Memory ControllerARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)Vivante GC7000UL
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.comwww.marvell.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (6%)     max: 8887 Points
8944 Points (7%)
11572 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (7%)     max: 8812 Points
8885 Points (7%)
11485 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (8%)     max: 10500 Points
9613 Points (8%)
13330 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493 Points
1717 Points (3%)
1796 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 476     avg: 498.7     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516 Points
575 Points (11%)
599 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 130     avg: 131.1     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.1 MFLOPS
226 MFLOPS (8%)
254 MFLOPS (9%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 54.9     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.4 MFLOPS
122 MFLOPS (12%)
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
13698 ms (16%)
16135 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 849     avg: 1179     median: 1240 (14%)     max: 1388 ms
1043 ms (11%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 702     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1170 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (3%)     max: 3095 Points
2059 Points (2%)
2775 Points (2%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
932 Points (25%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1231 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1871 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
5287 points (12%)
8542 points (20%)
7189 points (17%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
23864 Points (56%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
22432 Points (23%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
354 Iter./s (11%)
584 Iter./s (18%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
7829 Iter./s (26%)
13307 Iter./s (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points
10868 Points (1%)
12178 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Marvell Armada PXA1908 → 119% n=12

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 135% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 06. 02:25:28

#0 checking url part for id 4137 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6776 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6191 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 04 Jun 2024 05:34:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.131s ... 0.132s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.132s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4137 +0.004s ... 0.136s

#8 got single benchmarks 4137 +0.025s ... 0.161s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6776 +0.004s ... 0.165s

#10 got single benchmarks 6776 +0.01s ... 0.175s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6191 +0.004s ... 0.178s

#12 got single benchmarks 6191 +0.008s ... 0.186s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.186s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.214s ... 0.4s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.4s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)