ERROR: No CPU found with the ID:11106

getCPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German CPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Rockchip RK3168 vs vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3168 vs vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

The Rockchip RK3168 is a low-end ARM SoC designed primarily for smartphones. It integrates two Cortex-A9 CPU cores with NEON extension, a PowerVR SGX 540 graphics card (400 MHz) and a memory controller for low-power (LP-) DDR2/DDR3. The performance should be comparable to other similarly clocked Cortex-A9 SoCs such as the Samsung Exynos 4210. Thanks to its 28nm manufacturing, the RK3168 is relatively power efficient and should enable longer battery life.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

ModelRockchip RK3168HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
Series
Series:
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Clock1200 MHz1530 - 2490 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 212 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Technology28 nm7 nm
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)HiSilicon Maleoon 910
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5690 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3878 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1202 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
33982 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
655341 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
182634 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 30. 23:18:23

#0 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11106 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.112s ... 0.113s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.113s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0.003s ... 0.116s

#8 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.006s ... 0.122s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11106 +0.002s ... 0.124s

#10 got single benchmarks 11106 +0s ... 0.124s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.002s ... 0.127s

#12 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.007s ... 0.134s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.182s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.182s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)