Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H vs AMD FX-8800P

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 2800H as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 15% faster than Ryzen 3 1200, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. All the values are rather high, making a high-performance cooling solution with two or three fans pretty much a necessity.

The CPU is built on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm process for subpar energy efficiency.

AMD FX-8800P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-8800P

The AMD FX-8800P is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2800HAMD FX-8800P
CodenameRaven Ridge (Zen)Carrizo
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Carrizo
Clock3300 - 3800 MHz2100 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP45 Watt35 Watt
Transistors4500 Million3100 Million
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP5FP4 BGA
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAHSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Series: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-8800P « 2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 207     avg: 255.3     median: 277 (2%)     max: 282 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 78     avg: 81.3     median: 82 (23%)     max: 84 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.53     avg: 3.1     median: 3.4 (4%)     max: 3.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 1 (23%)     max: 0.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2417     avg: 2604     median: 2604 (16%)     max: 2791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6820     avg: 7860     median: 7860 (6%)     max: 8900 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
377.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
12 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1543 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.1 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
93.5 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4227 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.1 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
874 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10073     avg: 10092     median: 10091.5 (8%)     max: 10110 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2363     avg: 2764     median: 2753.5 (7%)     max: 3187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24378     avg: 30901     median: 32521 (26%)     max: 34183 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2106     avg: 2720     median: 2843 (7%)     max: 2943 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4031     avg: 4119     median: 4119 (7%)     max: 4207 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1074 Points (25%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
3185 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2085 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6719 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2218 Points (33%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2800H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-8800P → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 11:58:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6843 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765623509s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Dec 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 10144 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6843 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 6843 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.027s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.028s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)