Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C vs AMD Athlon Silver 7120C

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

► remove from comparison AMD R3 7320C

The AMD Ryzen 3 7320C is a mobile processor for Chromebooks of the Mendocino series. It integrates four older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series like the Ryzen 3 4300U). The CPU cores clock from 2.4 GHz (base) to 4.1 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 8 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.). Compared to the fastest Mendocino model the Ryzen 5 7520C, the 7320C offers lower clocked CPU cores (400 MHz base, and 200 MHz Turbo).

The 7320C is the Chromebook version of the Ryzen 5 7320U with identical specifications.

The integrated graphics card (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

The CPU performance should be slightly better than a Ryzen 4000U quad-core thanks to the faster memory and high clock speeds. Therefore, the CPU should be faster than the old Ryzen 3 4300U (4x 2.7 - 3.7 GHz, Zen 2, 7nm).

The Mendocino series are produced in a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The R3 7320C is rated at 15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

AMD Athlon Silver 7120C

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 7120C

The AMD Athlon Silver 7120U is a mobile processor for cheap Chromebooks of the Mendocino series. It integrates two older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series). The CPU cores clock from 2.4 GHz (base) to 3.5 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 2 MB L3 cache. It does not support SMT/Hyperthreading and therefore supports only 2 threads. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.). Compared to the faster Mendocino models like the Ryzen 5 7520C, the 7120C offers only two cores, no SMT, a smaller L3 cache and reduced clock speeds, leading to a clearly lower CPU performance. The specifications are identical to the Athlon Silver 7120U for (Windows) laptops.

The integrated graphics card (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

The CPU performance should be similar than the fastest Ryzen dual-core (Ryzen 3 3250U, 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Zen 1) but clearly stay behind modern quad-core CPUs (in multi threaded tests). 

The Mendocino series are produced in a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The Athlon Gold 7120C is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 7320CAMD Athlon Silver 7120C
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
CodenameMendocino (Zen 2)Mendocino (Zen 2)
Series: Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) Mendocino (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C compare2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U compare2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120C2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C compare2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U compare2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120C « 2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2400 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz AMD Zen 2
2 / 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology6 nm6 nm
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 23:27:17

#0 checking url part for id 15042 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15050 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15042 +0.002s ... 0.026s

#7 got single benchmarks 15042 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15050 +0.002s ... 0.035s

#9 got single benchmarks 15050 +0s ... 0.035s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)