Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR G6200 vs Qualcomm Adreno 510

PowerVR G6200

► remove from comparison Imagination PowerVR G6200

The PowerVR G6200 from Imagination Technologies is a mobile graphics solution that is used in ARM SoCs like the MediaTek MT8135. The chip is available since 2014 and designed for mid-range devices.

Architecture and Performance

The GPU is based on the series 6 (Rogue) and integrates two clusters with two TMUs each and a scalar Unified Shader architecture. Depending on the available memory bandwidth and clock rate, the performance is similar to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 and ARM Mali-T624 MP4. High-resolution displays (up to 2560 x 1600 pixels) and demanding mobile games of 2014 will be handled without problems. Among others, the GPU supports OpenGL 3.x/4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as DirectX 10.

Clock rates and performance of the G6200 may vary between different SoCs. For example, the Mediatek MT6795 has a somewhat higher GPU frequency than the MT8135 (700 vs. 600 MHz).

Energy Consumption

Especially the lower clocked versions of the G6200 are very energy efficient and therefore suited for medium-sized smartphones and tablets. Usually, the GPU can be found in SoCs manufactured in 28nm.

Qualcomm Adreno 510

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 510

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

PowerVR G6200Qualcomm Adreno 510
Adreno 500 Series
PowerVR G6430 compare
PowerVR G6400 compare @ 0.4 - 0.53 GHz
PowerVR G6200 64 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
CodenameRogue
ArchitecturePowerVR RogueAdreno 500
Pipelines64 - unified
Core Speed450 - 700 MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
FeaturesOpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement10.09.2013 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imgtec.com
technology14 nm
CPU in PowerVR G6200GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT6595 Turbo8 x 2500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT65958 x 2200 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT6595M8 x 2000 MHz? MHz450 MHz
min. - max.? MHz450 - 700 MHz
CPU in Adreno 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM89768 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM89566 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 9647     avg: 10504     median: 10686 (1%)     max: 11180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 10551     avg: 10808     median: 10862 (1%)     max: 10955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 5877     avg: 6207     median: 6304 (1%)     max: 6440 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1381     avg: 1454     median: 1441.5 (6%)     max: 1579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1354     avg: 1395     median: 1389.5 (3%)     max: 1459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
971 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
867 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
3.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
7.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR G6200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 14     avg: 14.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
60.5 fps (100%)
44.8 fps (74%)
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
6.4 fps (30%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
15120 Points (34%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
26078 Points (58%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
60.4 fps (90%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3960     avg: 4040     median: 4039.5 (1%)     max: 4119 Points
6078 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 998     avg: 1002     median: 1002 (1%)     max: 1006 Points
2559 Points (3%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2793     avg: 2805     median: 2805 (61%)     max: 2817 Points
4270 Points (93%)

Average Benchmarks PowerVR G6200 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 192% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 510:
30 50 57 60 ~ 49 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 510:
20 29 30 30 ~ 27 fps
PowerVR G6200Qualcomm Adreno 510
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 249
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
PowerVR G6200Qualcomm Adreno 510
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 16. 14:09:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5995 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765890555s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5995 +0.014s ... 0.034s

#9 got single benchmarks 5995 +0.006s ... 0.04s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0s ... 0.04s

#11 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.011s ... 0.051s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.066s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.068s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.071s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.074s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.084s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.084s

#19 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.087s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.087s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.087s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.088s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.088s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)