Notebookcheck

Oukitel C13 Pro Smartphone Review

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), 04/29/2019

A smartphone for 70 Euros? The budget Oukitel smartphone looks very impressive for a device in this price range. But is it really the low-priced smartphone to buy? Our review of the Oukitel C13 Pro answers this question.

Oukitel C13 Pro smartphone

The 6.18-inch C13 Pro from Oukitel looks like an entry-level smartphone with relatively small bezels. However, one cannot overlook the fact that it very closely resembles Apple’s iPhone X and XS.   

As is usual for smartphones in this price range, the Oukitel C13 Pro features very anemic hardware. It is powered by the Mediatek MT6739 and has only 2 GB of RAM. The IPS display has a native resolution of 996x480, which is why it is not very sharp. However, the manufacturer claims that it is “terrifically bright”.

The LTE-enabled smartphone comes in two color schemes: Black and Gold. Currently, it can be purchased from importers for about 70 Euros ($78). The device can also be bought from German distributors. Here, the prices on Amazon.de start at about 90 Euros ($100) (shipping through Amazon).

The Oukitel U25 Pro is the main competitor of the C13 Pro, which is also manufactured by Oukitel. Other competing devices include: the Nokia 2.1, the Cubot J3 as well as Xiaomi’s Redmi 6A and Redmi Go.

Oukitel C13 Pro (C Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
6.18 inch 18.7:9, 996 x 480 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS LCD, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm headphone jack, Card Reader: microUSB up to 128 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Motion sensor, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G/GSM: 850/900/1800/1900MHz (B5/B8/B3/B2), 3G/WCDMA: 900/2100MHz (B8/B1), 4G/FDD-LTE: 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz (B20/B8/B3/B1/B7), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 155.5 x 76 ( = 0.33 x 6.12 x 2.99 in)
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix 8+2 dual camera, Camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Mono-speaker, Keyboard: Onscreen Layout, Charger, microUSB cable, plastic protective cover, Quick Start Guide, Oukitel UI, 12 Months Warranty, LTE Cat.4 (150 Mbps/50 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L3, fanless
Weight
177 g ( = 6.24 oz / 0.39 pounds), Power Supply: 51 g ( = 1.8 oz / 0.11 pounds)
Price
90 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Case - Oukitel C13 Pro’s build quality meets expectations

Color schemes
Color schemes
of the Oukitel C13 Pro
of the Oukitel C13 Pro

The scratch-proof 2.5D front display glass is slightly curved and melds seamlessly with the plastic sides. The bezels of the 6.18-inch screen are quite small for an entry-level smartphone. Therefore, the screen-to-body ratio amounts to 82%.

The volume rocker as well as the power button leave a solid impression. The buttons sit firmly in their respective cutouts and have a clear actuation point. The rest of the smartphone is also surprisingly well made. 

Oukitel C13 Pro Smartphone

Size Comparison

155.5 mm / 6.12 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs153.8 mm / 6.06 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 9.8 mm / 0.3858 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs153.6 mm / 6.05 inch 77.6 mm / 3.06 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 174 g0.3836 lbs147.5 mm / 5.81 inch 71.5 mm / 2.81 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 145 g0.3197 lbs141.4 mm / 5.57 inch 66.3 mm / 2.61 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 148 g0.3263 lbs140.4 mm / 5.53 inch 70.1 mm / 2.76 inch 8.35 mm / 0.3287 inch 137 g0.302 lbs

Connectivity - Oukitel smartphone with a 3.5-mm headphone jack

16 GB of internal eMMC memory is not a lot, but defensible, given the fact that the smartphone costs roughly 70 Euros ($78). Only 10 GB thereof is available to the user, the rest of the storage space is occupied by the operating system. Those who need more storage space can insert a MicroSD card with a capacity of up to 128 GB into the smartphone. External storage can be formatted as internal memory. However, the file system known as exFAT is not supported by the device.

The C13 Pro has a Micro USB port, which operates at USB 2.0 speeds. The smartphone is charged through this port. Peripheral devices cannot be connected to the C13 Pro, because it does not support USB OTG. The smartphone can wirelessly cast its screen content to an external display. The 6.18-inch Oukitel smartphone can only play back DRM-protected content on streaming websites such as Netflix and Co in SD quality, because it only supports Google's Widevine L3 DRM. Given the low resolution of the C13 Pro’s display, this is quite bearable.

The Oukitel smartphone does not feature an LED status light. However, it comes with a finger-print sensor and an FM radio, which can only be used with the included in-ear headphones. The C13 Pro also supports Dual-SIM functionality.   

Software - C13 Pro with Android 9.0

The Chinese smartphone runs Android 9.0 with a proprietary UI. The security patches were last updated in February 2018, which is why they cannot be considered current.

The manufacturer’s user interface looks a lot like stock Android. Moreover, the smartphone comes with no third-party apps pre-installed. 

Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

Communication and GPS - Oukitel C13 Pro without NFC

The Oukitel smartphone features support for Bluetooth 4.0, but not for Near Field Communication (NFS).

The integrated Wi-Fi module supports the following wireless communications standards: 802.11 a, b, g and n and operates in the 2.4 and 5 GHz spectral bands. In day-to-day use, we did not encounter any reception problems. In close proximity to the router (Telekom Speedport, W921V), we measured a signal attenuation of -52 dBm. With our reference-grade router Linksys EA8500, the Oukitel smartphone achieves an average data reception rate of 94 Mb/s and an average date transmission rate of 84 Mb/s.

In the mobile Internet, the Dual-SIM smartphone can achieve a download speed of up to 150 Mb/s (LTE Cat. 4). Both SIM card slots support LTE. However, the built-in 4G modem can only operate in 5 LTE bands. When compared to other imported smartphones, the C13 Pro features support for LTE Band 20.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +707%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼34% +171%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
91.2 (min: 44, max: 108) MBit/s ∼13% +9%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 7, max: 105) MBit/s ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼9% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 46, max: 58) MBit/s ∼8% -34%
Cubot J3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.4 (min: 45, max: 59) MBit/s ∼8% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼7% -42%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼100% +468%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼41% +131%
Oukitel C13 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
94 (min: 34, max: 102) MBit/s ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
85.6 (min: 42, max: 106) MBit/s ∼16% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 48, max: 61) MBit/s ∼11% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼10% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼10% -44%
Cubot J3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.9 (min: 40, max: 56) MBit/s ∼10% -45%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø79.8 (7-105)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø94.1 (34-102)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
GPS test indoors
GPS test indoors

When it comes to geolocation, the C13 Pro supports GPS and GLONASS. Outdoors, the Chinese smartphone has a margin of error of roughly 3 meters (~10 feet). In general, the device connected to the satellites in a fast and reliable fashion, but at times it took the C13 Pro several minutes to establish a connection. When we tried to acquire our location indoors, our review device failed to do so.

In order to determine how accurate our review device is when it comes to geolocation, we take it with us on a bike ride. The low-priced smartphone mapped the route that we took very accurately, which is why it should be good enough for occasional navigation, provided that it can connect to the navigation satellites.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro
GPS Oukitel C13 Pro

Telephony and Call Quality - Oukitel WP1 with Wi-Fi calling and VoLTE

Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

During our review, we did not encounter any issues while making phone calls. The voices are reproduced clearly. We find the quality of the microphone to be satisfactory and our call partner describes the voices on the other end as clear and intelligible.

You can enable Voice over LTE (VoLTE), which allows you to make phone calls over 4G networks, and Wi-Fi calling, which allows you to place phone calls over a Wi-Fi connection, in the settings menu.

Cameras - Oukitel C13 Pro with a dual-camera

Shot with the front-facing camera
Shot with the front-facing camera

The CMOS image sensor on the back of the device has a resolution of 8 MP (2448x3264). There is also a secondary 2 MP image sensor on the back, which is responsible for depth perception. In theory, this should allow the smartphone to create depth maps, which can be used to produce a Bokeh effect in photographs. However, covering up the second lens did not have any impact on the Bokeh effect, which means that it is generated completely through software.

These days, an f/2.8 aperture can only be described as subpar. In low-light conditions, the 8 MP rear camera consistently delivers unusable images. Under good lighting conditions, the image quality is not even good enough for social media. The processing times of the camera are also very long.

As you can expect from a smartphone in this price range, the image quality of the front-facing camera is very poor. The color reproduction of the 5 MP selfie camera is just as poor as that of the main camera. The front-facing shooter can record video at 720p 30 FPS. The rear camera can shoot video in 1080p at 30 FPS.

Photo mode
Photo mode
Bokeh mode
Bokeh mode
Mono mode
Mono mode
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

Accessories and Warranty - Oukitel smartphone with a protective cover

The box contains the smartphone itself, a USB cable, a plastic protective cover and a modular EU charger (1 A, 5 V).

The C13 Pro comes with a 12-month warranty. Go to our guide to learn what you need to look out for when importing a smartphone.

Input Devices and Handling - The fingerprint scanner in the Oukitel C13 Pro is barely usable

The capacitive multi-touch screen of the Oukitel C13 Pro recognizes inputs most of the time reliably and quickly. There are times when certain inputs are registered incorrectly, but this seems to be the fault of a weak SoC rather than the touchscreen itself.  

The touchscreen can recognize up to 5 fingers at the same time. The anti-fingerprint coating on the screen feels pleasant and smooth. However, the display is still pretty susceptible to fingerprints. The smartphone is controlled via the usual on-screen buttons. There are no other ways to control the device.

The fingerprint scanner on the back is both slow and unreliable. It takes actually several seconds for the smartphone to be unlocked using the built-in fingerprint sensor. The FaceLock feature works better. However, it uses simple 2D-based facial recognition technology. It works reliably, but is very slow.

Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

Display - C13 Pro with a 480p IPS panel

Pixel arrangement
Pixel arrangement

The LCD screen of the C13 Pro has a resolution of 996x480 and an 18.7:9 aspect ratio. It measures 6.18 inches diagonally and therefore has a pixel density of 180 ppi, which is very low. This is why media content and text, in particular, do not look sharp on the screen.

The maximum screen brightness of 388 cd/m² is not very high, but the brightness distribution of 88% is quite good. In our realistically oriented APL50 test, in which the screen displays a pattern that consists of evenly distributed dark and bright areas, the display only manages to achieve 295 cd/m².

396
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
388
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 428 cd/m² Average: 401.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 388 cd/m²
Contrast: 1492:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 11.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.58
Oukitel C13 Pro
IPS LCD, 996x480, 6.18
Oukitel U25 Pro
IPS LCD, 1920x1080, 5.5
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Cubot J3
TN LED, 960x480, 5
Xiaomi Redmi Go
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
8%
10%
21%
-92%
7%
62%
Brightness middle
388
649
67%
338
-13%
404
4%
400
3%
340
-12%
593
53%
Brightness
402
623
55%
327
-19%
400
0%
401
0%
309
-23%
587
46%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
82
-7%
82
-7%
92
5%
77
-12%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.56
-115%
0.27
-4%
0.26
-0%
1.7
-554%
0.28
-8%
Contrast
1492
1159
-22%
1252
-16%
1554
4%
235
-84%
1214
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.2
7.1
23%
5.36
42%
4.28
53%
13.79
-50%
5.53
40%
0.9
90%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.4
12.6
32%
9.77
47%
9.97
46%
20.74
-13%
9.87
46%
2
89%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.7
9.4
20%
6.2
47%
3.5
70%
16.5
-41%
6.4
45%
1.5
87%
Gamma
2.58 85%
2.1 105%
2.345 94%
2.213 99%
3.19 69%
2.275 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
11121 58%
8629 75%
8460 77%
6899 94%
21261 31%
8198 79%
6548 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9270 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Because an IPS panel always has to use a backlight, it can never achieve the same deep blacks as an OLED panel. However, the C13 Pro has a rather low black value of 0.26 cd/m². The contrast ratio of 1500:1 is also quite good. That being said, both the contrast ratio (843:1) and the black value (0.35 cd/m²) turn out to be much worse in the APL50 test.

We use a photospectrometer running SpectraCal's CalMAN software to measure the color accuracy of the display. Both the grayscale (11.7) and the mixed and primary colors (9.2) deviate significantly from the sRGB standard. At 11000 Kelvin, the color temperature of the display is also too high. We can observe a bluish cast in day-to-day use.

CalMan color accuracy (sRGB)
CalMan color accuracy (sRGB)
CalMan color space coverage (sRGB)
CalMan color space coverage (sRGB)
CalMan grayscale (sRGB)
CalMan grayscale (sRGB)
CalMan saturation (sRGB)
CalMan saturation (sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.6 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

The brightness does not fall significantly when the display is viewed at an angle and the color accuracy is also okay when the screen is viewed from the side. Outdoors, the screen content is hard to read, because of the low brightness of the screen. The C13 Pro is not usable in direct sunlight.

Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

Performance - Mediatek MT6739 with 2 GB of RAM

The Mediatek MT6739 in the Oukitel smartphone is an ARM-based SoC from 2017. It has four 64-bit, Cortex-A53 cores that are clocked at 1.5 GHz. The PowerVR GE8100 serves as the graphics unit. It has a core frequency of 570 MHz.

Together with only 2 GB of RAM, the entry-level CPU offers solid system performance – here the low pixel density of the display comes in handy. Nevertheless, the Oukitel smartphone brings up the rear in our benchmark suite - with the exception of the PCMark benchmarks. The PowerVR GE8100, in particular, cannot keep up with the competition.

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1460 Points ∼20%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2115 Points ∼28% +45%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1405 Points ∼19% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1699 Points ∼23% +16%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
870 Points ∼12% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1394 Points ∼19% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +412%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1125 - 1460, n=12)
1328 Points ∼18% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼63% +221%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1896 Points ∼17%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2727 Points ∼25% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼15% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼22% +30%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1174 Points ∼11% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1634 Points ∼15% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +480%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1418 - 1896, n=14)
1733 Points ∼16% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼43% +149%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
675 Points ∼19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
674 Points ∼19% 0%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼18% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼23% +22%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
437 Points ∼12% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
631 Points ∼18% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +422%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (571 - 675, n=14)
632 Points ∼18% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼40% +111%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5377 Points ∼60%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
3850 Points ∼43% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3192 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2467 - 5377, n=14)
3145 Points ∼35% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=388)
5333 Points ∼59% -1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3742 Points ∼34%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5154 Points ∼47% +38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼56% +66%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2695 Points ∼25% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4050 Points ∼37% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +194%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (3742 - 4711, n=9)
4178 Points ∼38% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=556)
5785 Points ∼53% +55%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
677 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
915 Points ∼24% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼20% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +455%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (573 - 677, n=12)
612 Points ∼16% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=396)
1981 Points ∼53% +193%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
325 Points ∼5% +72%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼4% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +3644%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (75 - 189, n=12)
97.5 Points ∼1% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=396)
1787 Points ∼25% +846%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
397 Points ∼7% +76%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼5% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +2528%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (93 - 225, n=12)
119 Points ∼2% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=397)
1658 Points ∼28% +637%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
698 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
904 Points ∼24% +30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼23% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼21% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
853 Points ∼23% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +443%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (530 - 698, n=14)
613 Points ∼16% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=424)
1893 Points ∼50% +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
189 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
496 Points ∼5% +162%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼2% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼4% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
248 Points ∼2% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +5345%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (131 - 189, n=14)
158 Points ∼2% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=424)
2386 Points ∼23% +1162%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
225 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
551 Points ∼7% +145%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼4% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼7% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
294 Points ∼4% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +3211%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (159 - 225, n=14)
189 Points ∼3% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=424)
2004 Points ∼27% +791%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼18%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
932 Points ∼25% +35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼22% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +445%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (486 - 690, n=15)
561 Points ∼15% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=476)
1888 Points ∼50% +174%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
82 Points ∼1% -56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼4% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +3335%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (65 - 185, n=15)
84.8 Points ∼1% -54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=476)
1478 Points ∼23% +699%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
221 Points ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
103 Points ∼2% -53%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼5% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +2393%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (80 - 221, n=15)
104 Points ∼2% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=477)
1423 Points ∼26% +544%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
690 Points ∼19%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1006 Points ∼28% +46%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼25% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼23% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
878 Points ∼24% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +424%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (445 - 690, n=15)
561 Points ∼16% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=516)
1754 Points ∼49% +154%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
185 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼1% -41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼0% -75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼4% +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
43 Points ∼0% -77%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +5285%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (102 - 185, n=15)
128 Points ∼1% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=515)
1936 Points ∼19% +946%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
211 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
136 Points ∼2% -36%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼1% -73%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼6% +116%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
55 Points ∼1% -74%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +3296%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (120 - 211, n=15)
153 Points ∼2% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=518)
1674 Points ∼23% +693%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10981 Points ∼43%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9979 Points ∼39% -9%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼41% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼56% +29%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8093 Points ∼32% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10188 Points ∼40% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +131%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7103 - 10981, n=15)
9375 Points ∼37% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=676)
14217 Points ∼56% +29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3700 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
8856 Points ∼8% +139%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼5% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼6% +83%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2469 Points ∼2% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5391 Points ∼5% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +2779%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2878 - 4346, n=15)
3363 Points ∼3% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=674)
22183 Points ∼21% +500%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4339 Points ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
9085 Points ∼15% +109%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼10% +41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼12% +77%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2920 Points ∼5% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6021 Points ∼10% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +1334%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (3392 - 4339, n=15)
3870 Points ∼6% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=674)
17924 Points ∼29% +313%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.1 fps ∼4%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼10% +162%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼8% +113%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼3% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼5% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +2638%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.9 - 6.1, n=16)
5.61 fps ∼3% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼23% +525%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
15 fps ∼25%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼27% +7%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼32% +27%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
11 fps ∼18% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
13 fps ∼22% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (8.2 - 15, n=16)
9.84 fps ∼16% -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼47% +87%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.1 fps ∼7% +163%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼3% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼6% +133%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +3604%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)
2.56 fps ∼3% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼22% +711%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼17%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
7.5 fps ∼13% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼10% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼20% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5.6 fps ∼9% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +500%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.4 - 10, n=16)
5.61 fps ∼9% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% +94%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.7 fps ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps ∼7% +176%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼6% +135%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +3959%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)
1.494 fps ∼2% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼26% +953%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.7 fps ∼12%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
5 fps ∼9% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼13% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +766%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)
3.51 fps ∼6% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼29% +149%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2 fps ∼8%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps ∼6% -25%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼11% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +1100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.61 - 2, n=4)
1.028 fps ∼4% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=189)
9.99 fps ∼42% +400%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.4 fps ∼3%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
0.9 fps ∼6% +125%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼5% +113%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +3900%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.21 - 0.4, n=3)
0.32 fps ∼2% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=188)
6.98 fps ∼44% +1645%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.5 fps ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.2 fps ∼6% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼12% +72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +1380%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.4 - 2.5, n=5)
2 fps ∼5% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=193)
14.7 fps ∼40% +488%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.3 fps ∼6% +283%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼6% +283%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +6733%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.95, n=5)
0.804 fps ∼2% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=193)
16.4 fps ∼40% +2633%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.6 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.5 fps ∼6% +317%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼5% +217%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +6900%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)
0.826 fps ∼2% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼29% +1933%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.6 fps ∼7%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps ∼7% +8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼8% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +1362%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)
1.553 fps ∼4% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼29% +319%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
46951 Points ∼13%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
54871 Points ∼15% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼16% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +698%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (26874 - 46951, n=13)
41995 Points ∼11% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=295)
143117 Points ∼38% +205%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
624 Points ∼45%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼47% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼53% +17%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
587 Points ∼43% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +121%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7 - 624, n=15)
165 Points ∼12% -74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=635)
760 Points ∼55% +22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
190 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
641 Points ∼7% +237%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼5% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼5% +154%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼2% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
426 Points ∼5% +124%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +4779%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (18 - 190, n=15)
161 Points ∼2% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼22% +989%
Memory (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
818 Points ∼20%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
983 Points ∼24% +20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼12% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼15% -26%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
266 Points ∼7% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
363 Points ∼9% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +393%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (420 - 1039, n=15)
768 Points ∼19% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼38% +87%
System (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1338 Points ∼16%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
1931 Points ∼23% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼15% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼17% +7%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
957 Points ∼11% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1210 Points ∼14% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +531%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1103 - 1526, n=15)
1294 Points ∼15% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼35% +124%
Overall (sort by value)
Oukitel C13 Pro
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
600 Points ∼13%
Oukitel U25 Pro
Mediatek MT6750T, Mali-T860 MP2, 4096
330 Points ∼7% -45%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼14% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼16% +24%
Cubot J3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
384 Points ∼8% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
207 Points ∼5% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +666%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (162 - 637, n=15)
291 Points ∼6% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼33% +150%

The Internet feels slow when you are surfing it with the C13 Pro. Demanding sites actually manage to load without any errors, but it takes a long time. In browser benchmarks, the Oukitel smartphone performs a bit better than in the CPU and GPU benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +426%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=107)
35.7 Points ∼62% +228%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼28% +49%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
10.876 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (10.4 - 10.9, n=2)
10.6 Points ∼19% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 74)
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +685%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼28% +118%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼20% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼18% +39%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
3303 Points ∼13% +6%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
3126 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)
2945 Points ∼12% -6%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼10% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
2411 Points ∼10% -23%
Cubot J3
Points ∼0% -100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Cubot J3 (Chrome 73)
19183 ms * ∼100% -25%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)
16427 ms * ∼86% -7%
Oukitel C13 Pro (Chrome 73)
15334.7 ms * ∼80%
Oukitel U25 Pro (Chrome Version 72)
14543.1 ms * ∼76% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
13899 ms * ∼72% +9%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼72% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼56% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=718)
10523 ms * ∼55% +31%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼53% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼10% +88%

* ... smaller is better

The speed of the internal eMMC memory is below what you would expect to see from this kind of memory. The SD card reader performs as well as the rest of the competition. We measure the speed of the SD card reader using our reference-grade SD card Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 (maximum read speed: 270 Mb/s; maximum write speed: 150 Mb/s).

Oukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 ProNokia 2.1Xiaomi Redmi 6ACubot J3Xiaomi Redmi GoXiaomi Mi 9Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
62%
23%
96%
-63%
19%
679%
-28%
39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.05
54.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
15.9 (Kingston 32GB)
-74%
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
39.4 (6.38 - 65.7, n=129)
-37%
49.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=428)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.25
71.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
8.1 (Kingston 32GB)
-90%
84.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
58.7 (8.1 - 87.7, n=129)
-28%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=428)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
9.99
16.76
68%
13.45
35%
52.23
423%
5.5
-45%
11.9
19%
165.32
1555%
7.89 (0.49 - 44.9, n=247)
-21%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=752)
123%
Random Read 4KB
22.98
55.95
143%
50.46
120%
33.94
48%
14.6
-36%
45.4
98%
149.36
550%
21.3 (2.49 - 62.1, n=247)
-7%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=752)
107%
Sequential Write 256KB
69.7
195.1
180%
51.18
-27%
131.67
89%
12.1
-83%
54.8
-21%
388.27
457%
42.5 (8.74 - 106, n=247)
-39%
97.6 (2.99 - 590, n=752)
40%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.76
284.34
7%
288.26
9%
277.54
5%
130.6
-51%
289.3
9%
666.06
152%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=247)
-38%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=752)
4%

Gaming - Oukitel smartphone with a PowerVR GE8100 graphics unit

Current Android games with high system requirements, such as PUBG Mobile or Asphalt 9 Legends, are playable, thanks to a low screen resolution of the Oukitel C13 Pro. However, massive drops in performance are a constant occurrence. 

Both the touchscreen and the sensors worked well in the course of our review.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
Asphalt 9 Legends

Emissions - C13 Pro does not produce a lot of heat

Temperature

The surface temperatures never become critical. The Oukitel C13 Pro does not feel hot even after long gaming sessions. According to our measurements, the surface temperatures of the entry-level smartphone peak at 36 °C (96.8 °F) under continuous load.

Max. Load
 33.4 °C
92 F
32.9 °C
91 F
31.1 °C
88 F
 
 33 °C
91 F
31.1 °C
88 F
32.1 °C
90 F
 
 31 °C
88 F
29.5 °C
85 F
31.5 °C
89 F
 
Maximum: 33.4 °C = 92 F
Average: 31.7 °C = 89 F
29.4 °C
85 F
29.9 °C
86 F
35.9 °C
97 F
28.8 °C
84 F
30.1 °C
86 F
34.7 °C
94 F
27.8 °C
82 F
30.4 °C
87 F
33.6 °C
92 F
Maximum: 35.9 °C = 97 F
Average: 31.2 °C = 88 F
Power Supply (max.)  32.6 °C = 91 F | Room Temperature 21.5 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Oukitel C13 Pro
Oukitel C13 Pro

Speakers

Pink Noise
Pink Noise

The C13 Pro has a mono-speaker on the bottom. It sounds good enough for a device in this price range and has a maximum volume of 87 dB(A).

Those who want to connect their own headphones to the Oukitel smartphone should do so. The included 3.5-mm headphone jack works without any problems.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.536.32523.730.53125.828.54022.2265033.128.86326.621.48024.220.610023.321.812521.816.616022.520.220018.223.925016.334.731515.646.440015.15250014.155.763013.960.780013.669100014.872.7125013.675160013.674.3200013.871.2250014.373315014.674.3400014.580.4500014.677.6630014.872.3800014.673.31000014.969.11250014.9571600014.942.2SPL26.686.5N0.861.6median 14.8median 69Delta1.51619.929.620.223.721.42622.925.626.933.418.220.722.820.819.121.315.817.516.52014.217.713.326.315.334.314.64214.748.414.555.713.76514.472.713.973.813.971.113.867.313.869.314.268.914.37014.671.414.674.214.379.31579.71573.314.759.926.384.70.855median 14.5median 67.30.716.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOukitel C13 ProOukitel U25 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oukitel C13 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Oukitel U25 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 44.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life - Oukitel smartphone has a 3000-mAh battery

Energy Consumption

When compared to the competition, the C13 Pro consumes a little more power. This is especially evident when the device is idle. However, according to the measurements from our database for the Mediatek MT6739, the energy consumption is on a normal level.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.33 / 2.53 / 2.58 Watt
Load midlight 3.18 / 4.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3
2000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
22%
24%
6%
-7%
2%
-21%
3%
Idle Minimum *
1.33
1.47
-11%
0.7
47%
0.7
47%
0.7
47%
1.2
10%
0.67
50%
1.522 (0.87 - 2.8, n=16)
-14%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=782)
34%
Idle Average *
2.53
2.88
-14%
1.2
53%
1.2
53%
1.5
41%
1.9
25%
1.26
50%
2.17 (1.6 - 3.5, n=16)
14%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=781)
31%
Idle Maximum *
2.58
2.96
-15%
1.9
26%
2
22%
2
22%
2.5
3%
1.29
50%
2.86 (1.68 - 6.3, n=16)
-11%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=782)
21%
Load Average *
3.18
4.74
-49%
3.2
-1%
3.4
-7%
4.6
-45%
4.5
-42%
3.71
-17%
4.73 (2.8 - 7, n=16)
-49%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=776)
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.15
5.99
-44%
4.8
-16%
4
4%
5.6
-35%
5.5
-33%
9.3
-124%
5.99 (3.5 - 11.9, n=16)
-44%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=776)
-43%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

The non-removable battery of the Oukitel C13 Pro has a capacity of 3000 mAh. In our practically oriented Wi-Fi test, which we conduct with the display brightness set to 150 cd/m2, the entry-level smartphone achieves a runtime of about 7 hours, which is why it falls behind the rest of the competition.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 9min
Oukitel C13 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U25 Pro
3200 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Cubot J3
2000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
429
491
14%
809
89%
761
77%
432
1%
749
75%
546
27%

Pros

+ low price
+ good build quality
+ IPS panel with a good contrast ratio

Cons

- slow SoC
- not a lot of RAM
- not a lot of storage space
- low-res display

Verdict - Things were better, Oukitel…

In Review: Oukitel C13 Pro. Review device provided courtesy of: Oukitel.
In Review: Oukitel C13 Pro. Review device provided courtesy of: Oukitel.

The C13 Pro from the Chinese manufacturer Oukitel is off to the races in the land of sub-100-Euro smartphones. However, unlike its cousin the U25 Pro, which we recommended and which costs negligibly more, the C13 Pro fails to impress. The dim, low-resolution display is no longer appropriate even for such a cheap smartphone. The camera is also unfit for taking demanding shots.

With its 6.18-inch smartphone, Oukitel appears to have cut corners in all the wrong places.   

The device, which is made of plastic, feels good in the hand. Thanks to a low pixel density, the relatively weak SoC offers solid system performance. The C13 Pro can even run current titles from the Google Play Store.

Oukitel C13 Pro - 04/26/2019 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
36 / 60 → 60%
Weight
90%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
11 / 63 → 17%
Application Performance
37 / 70 → 52%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
48%
Average
66%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oukitel C13 Pro Smartphone Review
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-04-29 (Update: 2019-05- 2)