Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Celeron N3160

► remove from comparison Intel N3160

The Intel Celeron N3160 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been announced in early 2016. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.24 GHz (Burst) and part of the Braswell platform. It is manufactured in a modern 14-nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s). Compared to the predecessor Celeron N3150, the N3160 has a 160 MHz higher Burst clock.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations. The per-MHz performance is still much lower compared to the more expensive Core series (e. g. Broadwell).

Performance

With 4 CPU cores and a clock between 1.6-2.24 GHz, the technical specifications are similar to the previous Celeron N2930, so the processor performance is only slightly better. This means the processor is well-suited for everyday tasks (office, browsing) and even light multi-tasking should be no problem.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 640 MHz, however, the GPU performance is much lower. On average, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), so its a bit slower than the older HD Graphics 4000. Only older and simpler titles like Counter Strike: GO will run smoothly. The chip still includes an advanced video unit with support for 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can usually be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Celeron N3160Intel Celeron N3060
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBraswellBraswell
Series: Celeron Braswell
» Intel Celeron N31601.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N30601.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N31601.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N30601.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 - 2240 MHz1600 - 2480 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 640 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N3160Intel Celeron N3060
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 74 Points
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (13%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (12%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (11%)     max: 1275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (3%)     max: 2402 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
3426 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N3060 +
1800 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3060 +
1361 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3060 +
43.1 s (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N3060 +
5.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N3060 +
28.4 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3060 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3060 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3060 +
0.5 GB/s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N3060 +
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N3060 +
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N3060 +
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (3%)     max: 1076 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
10140 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
8087 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19687 Points (17%)
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
1124 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3160 +
1696 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1708 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
913 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1091 Points (13%)
1127 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3305 Points (4%)
1911 Points (2%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4300 ms (5%)
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
991 ms (11%)
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
8018 Points (8%)
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (8%)     max: 8303 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 N3160 +
3380 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 N3160 +
7992 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 N3160 +
5399 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N3160 +
7580 Points (38%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
100%
1 N3160 +
36 Points (20%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3160 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 85% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 22. 16:38:45

#0 checking url part for id 8167 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#12 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8167 +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.014s

#17 got single benchmarks 8167 +0.009s ... 0.023s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0s ... 0.023s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.024s

#20 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.029s ... 0.053s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.034s ... 0.087s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#82 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.103s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.127s

#84 return log +0.004s ... 0.131s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)