Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron N3000

Intel Celeron N2940

► remove from comparison Intel N2940

The Intel Celeron N2940 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.25 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2940 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2940 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2940 is similar to or slightly faster than the AMD Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts (4.5 W SDP - Scenario Design Power). Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

Intel Celeron N3000

► remove from comparison Intel N3000

The Intel Celeron N3000 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.04 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock (IPC) has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Due to only two CPU cores, low clock rates and the weak IPC, the Celeron N3000 is not sufficient for demanding applications and may even struggle on complex websites. Overall, performance is similar to the old Celeron N2810.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 4 watts (SDP 3 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Celeron N2940Intel Celeron N3000
CodenameBay Trail-MBraswell
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron N2940 « 1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 compare1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 « 1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1830 - 2250 MHz1040 - 2080 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt4 Watt
Technology22 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, SpeedstepIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N2940 +
min: 89     avg: 110.5     median: 110.5 (1%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2940 +
min: 35     avg: 35.5     median: 35.5 (10%)     max: 36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N2940 +
min: 1.57     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2940 +
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2940 +
1150 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2940 +
3958 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2940 +
5784 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2940 +
1663 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2940 +
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2940 +
29.2 s (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2940 +
9.4 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2940 +
46.9 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2940 +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2940 +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2940 +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2940 +
2191 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2940 +
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2940 +
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2940 +
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2940 +
1635 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N2940 +
17767 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N2940 +
1257 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2940 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 06. 16:02:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6009 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6782 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759759367s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6009 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 6009 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6782 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 6782 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.024s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)