Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N2600 vs AMD E-350

Intel Atom N2600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2600 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 after some troubles with the graphics drivers (according to rumors). 

The N2600 features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 400MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2600 is comparable to an older Atom N570.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 2 GB RAM.

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average E-350 in our database is in the same league as the V120, E-450, E1-2500 and also the Celeron SU2300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

The ThinkPad X121e as well as the ThinkPad X120e are among the fastest systems built around the E-350 that we know of.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics adapter offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

show full text
ModelIntel Atom N2600AMD E-350
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
CodenameCedarview-MZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2800 compare1.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2600 « 1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1600 MHz1600 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP3.5 Watt18 Watt
Technology32 nm40 nm
SocketFCBGA559FT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesGMA 3600 (400MHz), Single Channel Memory Controller (2GB DDR3)DDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86
$47 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
Die Size75 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 531     avg: 540     median: 541 (3%)     max: 547 Points
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (6%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1434     avg: 1513     median: 1527.5 (1%)     max: 1562 Points
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (1%)     max: 2080 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (1%)     max: 1158 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
2064 s (24%)
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
66 s (13%)
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.1 s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2600 +
9.9 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2600 +
9.8 fps (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (2%)     max: 829 Points
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (2%)     max: 1033 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
92 s (20%)
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
204 s (9%)
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
4541 s (20%)
min: 2410     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
8139 MIPS (4%)
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2600 +
1631 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.3 Points (42%)
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
-1 Points (-0%)
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
-1 Points (-0%)
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2600 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 120% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 09:23:47

#0 checking url part for id 2684 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2684 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 2684 +0.018s ... 0.052s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.073s ... 0.127s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.115s ... 0.243s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.251s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.254s

#14 return log +0.03s ... 0.285s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)