Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom N2600 vs Intel Celeron 1019Y

Intel Atom N2600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom N2600 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 after some troubles with the graphics drivers (according to rumors). 

The N2600 features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 400MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2600 is comparable to an older Atom N570.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 2 GB RAM.

Intel Celeron 1019Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1019Y is an entry-level ULV processor for ultrabooks and tablets. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, but with many core features disabled including Turbo Boost, Virtualization VT-d, HyperThreading, AES and Trusted Execution. Every core offers a clock speed of 1.0 GHz and, as with other dual-core Celeron CPUs, the 1019Y offers 2 MB of L3 Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of a Celeron 1019Y should be slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to slight architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance should be just a bit below that of the Pentium 957.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics offers 6 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 350 MHz up to 800 MHz with Turbo Boost.

The 1019Y is rated at a TDP of 10 W including the integrated graphics card and memory controller. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for tablets and ultrabooks.

ModelIntel Atom N2600Intel Celeron 1019Y
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
CodenameCedarview-MIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Atom N2850 compare2 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2800 compare1.86 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2650 compare1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N2600 « 1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y « 1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Clock1600 MHz1000 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP3.5 Watt10 Watt
Technology32 nm22 nm
SocketFCBGA559BGA
FeaturesGMA 3600 (400MHz), Single Channel Memory Controller (2GB DDR3)Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$47 U.S.$153 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache2 MB
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2600 +
min: 531     avg: 540     median: 541 (3%)     max: 547 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2600 +
min: 1434     avg: 1513     median: 1527.5 (1%)     max: 1562 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2600 +
2064 s (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2600 +
66 s (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2600 +
9.9 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2600 +
9.8 fps (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2600 +
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (2%)     max: 829 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2600 +
92 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2600 +
204 s (9%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2600 +
4541 s (20%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2600 +
8139 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2600 +
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N2600 +
1631 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N2600 +
3.3 Points (42%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
-1 Points (-0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
-1 Points (-0%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2600 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 00:34:49

#0 checking url part for id 2684 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3943 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2684 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 2684 +0.016s ... 0.047s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3943 +0.003s ... 0.049s

#9 got single benchmarks 3943 +0s ... 0.05s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.048s ... 0.098s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.102s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.102s

#14 return log +0.056s ... 0.158s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)