, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT

More pipelines and a faster clockspeed enable the X1800XT to have more performance than the X1800 and make it therefore good for elder DirectX 9 games. It is comparable with NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX.

Benchmark: notebookreview.com (engl)

ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

At the moment, the ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 is the top video card from ATI for notebooks. The performance is better than X1800 / 7900GS. Due to heat problems the marketing was delayed but now this problem seems to be fixed. According first reports it is about 12% faster than a X1800 (Alienware configurator). The performance in our tests was about as fast as the Nvidia 7900 GS.

The X1900 is a enhanced X1800 produced in 80nm. The 36 Pixel Shader count like 12 pipelines from Nvidia cards.

The AVIVO technology allows the chip to accelerate H.264, DivX, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, WMV9, and VC-1 videos.

ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XTATI Mobility Radeon X1900
ManufacturerATIATI
Mobility Radeon X1000 Series
Mobility Radeon X1900 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1900 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM58, R520M59
Pipelines16 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader36 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed550 MHz400 MHz
Memory Speed650 MHz470 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
technology90 nm80 nm
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement01.03.2006 11.01.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.ati.com/de/products/mobilityr...http://ati.amd.com/de/products/mobilityr...
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Transistors312 Million
FeaturesAvivo Video and Display Engine. 12 pixelshaders are regulated by 3 cores; Powerplay 6.0
Information312 Millionen Transistoren, 80nm, PCI-E 16x, MXM-III odul

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
25914 Points (27%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 11800     avg: 12020     median: 12019.5 (6%)     max: 12239 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 7300     avg: 7539     median: 7539 (11%)     max: 7778 Points
min: 7080     avg: 7117     median: 7117 (10%)     max: 7154 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon X1900
3DMark 06
min: 3185     avg: 3399     median: 3460 (6%)     max: 3551 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 → 94% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1900:
151  fps
med. 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1900:
52  fps
high 1280x1024
Mobility Radeon X1900:
39  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1900:
80  fps
med. 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1900:
39  fps
high 1280x1024
Mobility Radeon X1900:
25  fps
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1900:
47  fps
ultra 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1900:
9  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1900:
63  fps
med. 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1900:
31  fps
high 1280x1024
Mobility Radeon X1900:
18  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1900:
260  fps
med. 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1900:
96  fps
high 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1900:
31  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1900:
148.5  fps
med. 640x480
Mobility Radeon X1900:
133.2  fps
high 800x600
Mobility Radeon X1900:
124.9  fps
ultra 1024x768
Mobility Radeon X1900:
94.3  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 19. 20:13:23

#0 checking url part for id 15 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:22:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.046s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15 +0.023s ... 0.069s

#8 got single benchmarks 15 +0.004s ... 0.074s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17 +0s ... 0.074s

#10 got single benchmarks 17 +0.004s ... 0.078s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.08s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.08s

#14 Got 18 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.082s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.082s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.083s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.088s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.088s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)