Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X600 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X700

ATI Mobility Radeon 9550

► remove from comparison

The ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 was a middle class graphics card for laptops. Technically it is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 featuring only a 64 Bit wide memory bus (instead of 128 Bit). Therefore, the performance was noticable slower.

ATI Mobility Radeon X600

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X600

ATI Mobility Radeon X600 is a lower middle graphic card for notebooks of the X000 series (also the 1000 series). Its performance is identical with the AGP chip Mobility Radeon 9700 (technically similar). The X700 is clearly better. X600 was replaced by the X1400.

Also a ATI Mobilty Radeon X600SE or X600 SE is inserted in some notebooks. This is a slower X600 with Hypermemory (only 32 MB own memory according to forum reports) and about 700 points in 3DMark 05.

ATI Mobility Radeon X700

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X700

ATI Mobility Radeon X700 is the middle class graphic card for notebooks of the X000 series (the 1000 series). Its performance can be compared with NVIDIA Go 6600. Technically it is comparable with the desktop X700 graphic chip + energy saving functions.

The VideoShader HD technology helps the cpu in decoding MPEG1/2/4, Real Media, DivX and WMV9.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon 9550ATI Mobility Radeon X600ATI Mobility Radeon X700
Mobility Radeon X000 Series
Mobility Radeon 9800 8/4 cores @ 0.35 GHz256 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9700 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 275 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9600 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 64 Bit @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9550 4/2 cores @ 0.21 GHz64 Bit @ 183 MHz
Mobility Radeon X700 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X600 4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz64 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X700 8/6 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X600 4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz64 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM12M24M26
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader8 / 6 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed210 MHz400 MHz350 MHz
Memory Speed183 MHz250 MHz350 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRDDR/DDR2DDR/DDR2
Max. Amount of Memory128 MB256 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0
technology130 nm130 nm110 nm
FeaturesPowerplay 4.0, Hyper-Z II, SmartShader 2.0, 840 MT/s Füllrate, 130nm110nm, PCIe, SMOOTHVISION 2.1, SMARTSHADER 2.0, POWERPLAY 5.0 und VPU RECOVER I110nm, PCIe, Powerplay 5.0 Stromspartechniken
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2004 01.06.2004 20.01.2005
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comwww.ati.comwww.ati.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 10000     avg: 10156     median: 10155.5 (11%)     max: 10311 Points
min: 14851     avg: 15676     median: 15675.5 (16%)     max: 16500 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3000     avg: 3156     median: 3156 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
min: 4795     avg: 5398     median: 5397.5 (3%)     max: 6000 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
1800 Points (2%)
min: 2262     avg: 2381     median: 2381 (3%)     max: 2500 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X600
3DMark 06
280 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X700
min: 570     avg: 735     median: 735 (1%)     max: 900 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X600 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X700 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 01. 03:40:10

#0 checking url part for id 64 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 32 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 27 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:41:40 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.195s ... 0.197s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.197s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.197s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 64 +0.051s ... 0.248s

#9 got single benchmarks 64 +0.008s ... 0.255s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 32 +0.002s ... 0.257s

#11 got single benchmarks 32 +0.034s ... 0.291s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 27 +0.002s ... 0.293s

#13 got single benchmarks 27 +0.056s ... 0.349s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.349s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.127s ... 0.476s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.476s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.48s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.482s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)