, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Mediatek MT6750N vs Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

Mediatek MT6750N

► remove from comparison  MT6750N

The ARM-based Mediatek MT6750N SoC (System on a Chip) is a mid-range mobile processor for smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It integrates 8 ARM Cortex-A53 cores consisting of 4 high-performance cores clocked at up to 1.5 GHz plus 4 low-power cores clocked at up to 1 GHz each. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a Cat. 6 LTE radio and an ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPU with 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth connectivity. Compared to the older MT6750, the graphics card seems to be clocked higher.

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the Cortex-A7 and introduces 64-Bit support (ARMv8-ISA). Its performance-per-Watt is significantly higher and is even slightly ahead of the old Cortex-A9. If utilizing all 8 of its cores, the Cortex-A53 can rival competing mobile processes in the high-end class range. However, no practical software has been specifically coded to use all 8 cores at such high performance levels.

In addition to the CPU and GPU cores, the SoC also contains a memory controller and the aforementioned Cat.6 LTE modem (FDD/TDD, DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE) with both 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth. The integrated video engine is able to record and playback 1080p videos at up to 30 FPS in hardware. Cameras are supported at up to 16 MP.

The MT6750 is still manufactured in 28nm and so power efficiency is not on par with modern 14/16nm chips.

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

The Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 is a mid-range ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets that was available starting in Q3 2015. The octa-core processor includes eight 64 Bit Cortex-A53 cores clocked with up to 2 GHz. Furthermore a ARM Mali-T860 MP2 graphics card with up to 700 MHz and a LTE Cat. 6 modem is integrated.

The performance of the CPU cores si similar to the Kirin 930 and therefore in the mid-range of smartphone SoCs in 2015 and 2016.

The SoC is manufactured at TSMC in 28nm (HPC+) and also suited for smartphones (e.g. the Elephone P9000).

Mediatek MT6750NMediatek Helio P10 MT6755
MediatekMediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
1500 MHz2000 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
28 28
Cat. 6 LTE (FDD & TDD), DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000, EDGE, 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, Bluetooth, 16 MP ISP, 1080p recording/playback, ARM Mali-T860 MP2 GPUUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, TD-SCDMA, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR Series 6 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-T860 MP2ARM Mali-T860 MP2 (700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek MT6750NMediatek Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11200     avg: 11251     median: 11250.5 (12%)     max: 11301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10044 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1031 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1013 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
795 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4696 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2696 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3064 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3370 (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
880 (18%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
665 (8%)
min: 616     avg: 721     median: 720.5 (9%)     max: 825
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2645 (3%)
min: 2628     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (4%)     max: 3225
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
14116 ms (24%)
min: 9346     avg: 11346     median: 9772 (16%)     max: 23913.5 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1107 ms (12%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3274 Points (5%)
min: 3163     avg: 3867     median: 3964.5 (6%)     max: 4395 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
31 Points (10%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 1248     avg: 1274     median: 1273.5 (34%)     max: 1299 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 1999     avg: 2190     median: 2189.5 (49%)     max: 2380 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 2975     avg: 3187     median: 3187 (42%)     max: 3399 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
22647 points (52%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
43987 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
4446 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
14401 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
11466 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
24506 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
54819 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
min: 89748     avg: 102617     median: 102616 (14%)     max: 115485 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
1699 Points (9%)
min: 1631     avg: 1783     median: 1782.5 (9%)     max: 1934 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
2820 Points (8%)
min: 2305     avg: 2787     median: 2786.5 (7%)     max: 3268 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
3138 Points (21%)
min: 3278     avg: 3344     median: 3350 (22%)     max: 3405 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
3885 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6750N → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 → 112% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 19:29:50

#0 checking url part for id 10096 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8061 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10096 +0s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 10096 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8061 +0s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 8061 +0.02s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)