MSI Megabook S271
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 6 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the MSI Megabook S271
Source: The Tech Zone
Archive.org versionThe MSI S271 is a very good looking notebook. The shape reminds us a lot of the Apple Powerbook and we're sure that was the look MSI was going for. If you don't like the business like black, the S271 can be ordered up in a range of difference colors. The S271 is made with a durable yet trendy aluminum and magnesium alloy, and is equipped with a Super Glare Type 12″ WXGA LCD, an ATI UMA embedded graphics display interface, and digital surround sound. Battery life depends greatly on what you're using the S271 for and whether you have wireless on or off. The S271 Dual CoreCell ASCI can dynamically over- and down-clock the CPU and GPU to enhance or conserve power and lead to longer battery life.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar
9 von 10, Display gut, Leistung gut, Mobilität mäßig
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/28/2006
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60%
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org versionThis is the first time we've seen an MSI-branded laptop, but it's clear that the Taiwanese manufacturer has ambitions to make a big impact in the UK market: the Megabook S271 is making an aggressive pitch for the mid-range market. The initial surprise with the Megabook is its pricing - it's a truly tiny laptop, it weighs a shoulder-friendly 2.1kg, yet it costs less than £700. The screen is a 12.1in panel with a resolution of 1,280 x 800. That's a notable improvement compared to ultraportables with a 1,024 x 768 resolution, although inevitably the pixels themselves are smaller. Nevertheless, we found the Megabook eminently suitable for working on the go. Great value for an ultraportable, although build quality is uninspiring;
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4 von 6, Preis überraschend gut, Verarbeitung mäßig
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2006
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 90% workmanship: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Guter Rat!
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/20/2007
Rating: display: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 100% performance: 59% features: 85% display: 84% mobility: 66% ergonomy: 66%
Source: c't
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/01/2006
Rating: price: 85% performance: 75% features: 85% display: 75% ergonomy: 85%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2006
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 79% performance: 88% features: 95% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 81%
Source: Connect
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2006
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 79% features: 62% ergonomy: 89%
Source: PC Praxis
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/16/2006
Rating: price: 80% performance: 85% features: 85%
Source: PC Professionell
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 87% features: 90% ergonomy: 91%
Comment
ATI Radeon Xpress 1150: Faster clocked Xpress 1100 onboard graphics card with x300 core. Should run Vista Aero Glass fluently.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
AMD Turion 64 X2: AMD Turion 64 X2 is intended to be positioned against the Intel Core Duo was presented in 17. May 2006. The current consumption is not higher than with Centrino-Duo-notebooks (TL-45 with ATI Xpress and Mobility Radeon X300). This means, that approximative the same battery runtime and fan functions can be expected (with this chipset). However, the performance was 20% below the T2300 (1.66 GHz) due to the lower L2 Cache (Core Duo has 2048 Kbyte shared L2 Cache). Nevertheless, the performance is sufficient.
TL-50: In 90nm produced dual core processor with a low clock rate of 1.6 GHz. The TL-50 is still based on the K8 core and compareable to a slower clocked Core Duo.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
