Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS

Apple M1 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Max

The Apple M1 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 48 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (32 or 64 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU. This is the main difference to the M1 Pro and the CPU performance is quite similar.

The biggest difference to the M1 Pro is the bigger integrated GPU with 24 or 32 cores (up from 16).

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including two ProRes engines).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 57 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. 

AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R7 5800H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process. Compared to the 5800H (up to 54 W), the 5800HS is configured to a TDP of 35W.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics adapter with 8 CUs (512 shaders) at up to 2,000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports dual-channel DDR4-3200 and quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 energy efficient RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 5800HS as of August 2023, we have tested several laptops featuring the 5800H, a chip with very similar specs (Cezanne, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.4 GHz). Based on that, we fully expect the 5800HS to be just slightly slower than the Core i5-12500H, Core i7-11800H, Core i7-12650H, Core i9-11950H and also the AMD Ryzen 9 4900H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is pretty damn fast, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The Ryzen has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 35 W. A proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

This Zen 2-based APU is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M1 MaxAMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
SeriesApple M1AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Cezanne-HS (Zen 3)
Apple M1 Max « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M1 compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS compare3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS compare3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS « 2.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS compare3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2060 - 3220 MHz2800 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache2.9 MB512 KB
L2 Cache28 MB4 MB
L3 Cache48 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 108 / 16
Transistors57000 Million
Technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUApple M1 Max 32-Core GPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenameCezanne-HS (Zen 3)
TDP35 Watt
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP6
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 12385     avg: 12389     median: 12386 (12%)     max: 12396 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 1530     avg: 1533     median: 1533 (64%)     max: 1536 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 390     avg: 393.3     median: 395 (43%)     max: 395 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 2735     avg: 2746     median: 2750 (7%)     max: 2753 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 1689     avg: 1691     median: 1691 (11%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 197     avg: 202.3     median: 200 (55%)     max: 210 Points
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 187     avg: 188.7     median: 189 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2442 Points (61%)
1818 Points (45%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12994 Points (50%)
7340 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
2319 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
12456 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1785     median: 1788.5 (68%)     max: 1798 Points
1380 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12563     avg: 12697     median: 12702.5 (23%)     max: 12818 Points
7454 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 404.3     avg: 459.2     median: 482.3 (1%)     max: 491.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 66938     avg: 68647     median: 68029 (50%)     max: 70973 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 350     avg: 358.7     median: 360 (65%)     max: 366 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M1 Max +
min: 1586     avg: 1607     median: 1615 (60%)     max: 1621 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
50.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
53 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
11.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 M1 Max +
31.9 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Max → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS → 67% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 12:31:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13843 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13011 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759055468s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13843 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 13843 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13011 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 13011 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.027s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.028s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)