HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930

HiSilicon Kirin 935

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 935 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2.2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 930

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 930 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 935HiSilicon Kirin 930
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
: Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 9352200 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2360 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2350 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2100 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9302000 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8168 compare2000 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1200 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1500 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1300 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8161 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1200 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 9352200 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2360 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2350 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2100 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2000 MHz8 / 8
» HiSilicon Kirin 9302000 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8168 compare2000 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1200 MHz8 / 8
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1500 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1300 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT8161 compare1300 MHz4 / 4
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1200 MHz4 / 4
2200 MHz2000 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
28 28
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.0 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 9176     avg: 9767     median: 9766.5 (6%)     max: 10357 Points
9337 Points (6%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 9379     avg: 9823     median: 9822.5 (12%)     max: 10266 Points
min: 9404     avg: 9487     median: 9499 (11%)     max: 9557 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 10360     avg: 11016     median: 11015.5 (13%)     max: 11671 Points
min: 10447     avg: 10528     median: 10494 (12%)     max: 10643 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 3888     avg: 3929     median: 3929 (6%)     max: 3970 Points
min: 3458     avg: 3498     median: 3497.5 (5%)     max: 3537 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 941     avg: 949     median: 949 (19%)     max: 957 Points
min: 864     avg: 873     median: 872.5 (18%)     max: 881 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 2955     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (6%)     max: 3468 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 698     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (16%)     max: 823 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
800 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
2912 Points (5%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
min: 270.13     avg: 276     median: 276.3 (9%)     max: 282.524 MFLOPS
min: 272.043     avg: 272     median: 272.3 (9%)     max: 272.482 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
min: 127.15     avg: 128     median: 128.4 (13%)     max: 129.572 MFLOPS
min: 120.972     avg: 122     median: 121.5 (12%)     max: 122.028 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 11028.7     avg: 13952     median: 13952.3 (23%)     max: 16876 ms
min: 9903     avg: 11085     median: 11543.5 (19%)     max: 11807.9 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 942     avg: 992     median: 991.9 (11%)     max: 1041.8 ms
min: 1021.4     avg: 1093     median: 1092.5 (12%)     max: 1163.6 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 4106     avg: 4376     median: 4376 (8%)     max: 4646 Points
min: 3866     avg: 4211     median: 4084 (8%)     max: 4682 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
1254 Points (34%)
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
2044 Points (46%)
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
2756 Points (36%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
13277 points (31%)
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
min: 47515     avg: 47624     median: 47623.5 (48%)     max: 47732 Points
min: 45927     avg: 47313     median: 47313 (48%)     max: 48699 Points
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
52322 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - MEM
6127 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v7 - UX
18789 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v7 - GPU
6649 Points (2%)
AnTuTu v7 - CPU
33799 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
65364 Points (12%)
AndEBench - Java
1338 Iter./s (41%)
AndEBench - Native
20284 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
125047 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score
3902 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
min: 4625     avg: 4749     median: 4748.5 (24%)     max: 4872 Points
min: 4358     avg: 4432     median: 4458 (23%)     max: 4479 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 935 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 930 → 96% n=12

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)