Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W vs Rockchip RK3288

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

Rockchip RK3288

► remove from comparison  RK3288

The Rockchip RK3288 is a mid-range ARM SoC for Android and Chrome OS mobile systems. It integrates four Cortex-A12 cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. ARM calls these cores Cortex-A17 due to them having very similar performance levels. The SoC includes an ARM Mali-T760 MP4 (also called Mali-T764) GPU clocked at 600 MHz and a dual-channel DDR3, DDR3L, LPDDR2, LPDDR3 memory controller.

The ARM Cortex-A12 is the successor to the Cortex-A9 and is based on a 32 Bit ARMv7-A microarchitecture. A single A12 core should be roughly 40 % more powerful than an A9 core according to ARM.

The integrated video engine supports encoding of H.264, VP8, and MVC videos up to 1080p. Decoding is supported for videos up to 4K H.264 and 10 Bit H.265.

The chip is manufactured under a 28 nm HKMG process.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 9000WRockchip RK3288
Clock1530 - 2490 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
4 / 4
Technology7 nm28 nm
iGPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910ARM Mali-T760 MP4 (600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
FeaturesARM MAli-T624 at 600 MHz, dedicated 2D processor, 1080P H.264, VP8, MVC encoding, 4K H.264 and 10 Bits H.265 decoding, 1080p multi video decode, Dual-channel DDR3(L) memory controller, HDMI 2.0
Manufacturerwww.rk3288.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3288 +
15496 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4731     avg: 5453     median: 5651 (53%)     max: 5778 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1174     avg: 1248     median: 1237 (31%)     max: 1343 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 3987     avg: 4109     median: 4038.5 (16%)     max: 4370 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 867     avg: 946     median: 965 (38%)     max: 1006 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3694     avg: 3841     median: 3878 (7%)     max: 3951 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4712     avg: 4744     median: 4743.5 (47%)     max: 4775 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13875     avg: 13927     median: 13926.5 (14%)     max: 13978 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 1909     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (4%)     max: 2456 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 698     avg: 779     median: 778.5 (15%)     max: 859 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 836.4     avg: 1076     median: 1112.9 (1%)     max: 1243.7 ms
min: 4753     avg: 5809     median: 5790 (7%)     max: 6884 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
min: 745     avg: 746     median: 745.5 (8%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 32134     avg: 37658     median: 35905.5 (27%)     max: 46687 Points
min: 5967     avg: 6798     median: 7107 (5%)     max: 7319 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 85     avg: 116     median: 109.5 (30%)     max: 160 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
200 Points (36%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
47100 Points (16%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 655341     avg: 684940     median: 684940 (33%)     max: 714538 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 182634     avg: 190270     median: 190270 (47%)     max: 197906 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 678210     avg: 706588     median: 706588 (23%)     max: 734965 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 279226     avg: 290833     median: 290833 (9%)     max: 302440 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 97.5     avg: 112.6     median: 110.5 (75%)     max: 129.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 1181     avg: 1393     median: 1434.9 (40%)     max: 1562 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 53.3     avg: 58     median: 57.4 (28%)     max: 63.18 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1521.67     avg: 1564     median: 1568 (44%)     max: 1601 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 45015     avg: 52045     median: 54852 (24%)     max: 56268 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 10620     avg: 12057     median: 11875.5 (44%)     max: 13858 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
3888 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 834     avg: 927     median: 922.5 (34%)     max: 1028 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.62     avg: 8.4     median: 8.9 (4%)     max: 10.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.67     avg: 4.5     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 5.81 Watt

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3288 → 22% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 06:36:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6984 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753763802s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6984 +0s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 6984 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.028s

#13 return log +0.019s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)