Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820e

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 820e

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820e

The HiSilicon Kirin 820e is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced 2022 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.22 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2 and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.84 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU. Compared to the similar named Kirin 820, the 820e offers slower clocked CPU cores on a level with the older Kirin 810.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 820HiSilicon Kirin 820e
SeriesHiSilicon HiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 « 1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e « 1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock1840 - 2360 MHz1840 - 2220 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.22 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP6ARM Mali-G57 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.hisilicon.comwww.hisilicon.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
0.9 pt (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
41610 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
4642 Points (55%)
3725 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4637 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
642 Points (27%)
566 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2434 Points (4%)
1853 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3113 Points (31%)
2820 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9860 Points (11%)
7841 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2834 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7461 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
6933 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
2344 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4235 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5223 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17014 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7277 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9969 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2254 ms (3%)
2174 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19727 Points (18%)
18755 Points (17%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
64 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
115 Points (24%)
86 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
68406 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
52226 Points (42%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
117476 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
131099 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
369207 Points (36%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
287379 Points (17%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
95606 Points (26%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
238069 Points (31%)
3553 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8006 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22692 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9527 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13099 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
552 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.4 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820e → 76% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 17:42:20

#0 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14536 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.107s ... 0.108s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.108s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.014s ... 0.122s

#7 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.01s ... 0.132s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14536 +0.003s ... 0.135s

#9 got single benchmarks 14536 +0.007s ... 0.142s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.142s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.056s ... 0.198s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.202s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.261s

#14 return log +0.022s ... 0.283s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)